Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269979›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2019

Active eukaryotes in drinking water distribution systems of ground and surface waterworks.

Jenni Inkinen, Balamuralikrishna Jayaprakash, Sallamaari Siponen, Anna-Maria Hokajärvi, Anna Pursiainen, Jenni Ikonen, Ivan Ryzhikov, Martin Täubel, Ari Kauppinen, Jussi Paananen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. FEMS microbes · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Two Drinking Water Outbreaks Caused by Wastewater Intrusion Including Sapovirus in Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenni InkinenDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland. jenni.inkinen@thl.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-4765-6253
Balamuralikrishna JayaprakashDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Sallamaari SiponenDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Anna-Maria HokajärviDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Anna PursiainenDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Jenni IkonenDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Ivan RyzhikovDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box, 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Martin TäubelDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Ari KauppinenDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Jussi PaananenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Ilkka T MiettinenDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Eila TorvinenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box, 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Mikko KolehmainenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box, 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Tarja PitkänenDepartment of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 95, FI-70701, Kuopio, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEukaryotes are ubiquitous in natural environments such as soil and freshwater. Little is known of their presence in drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs) or of the environmental conditions that affect their activity and survival.

methodsEukaryotes were characterized by Illumina high-throughput sequencing targeting 18S rRNA gene (DNA) that estimates the total community and the 18S rRNA gene transcript (RNA) that is more representative of the active part of the community. DWDS cold water (N = 124), hot water (N = 40), and biofilm (N = 16) samples were collected from four cities in Finland. The sampled DWDSs were from two waterworks A-B with non-disinfected, recharged groundwater as source water and from three waterworks utilizing chlorinated water (two DWDSs of surface waterworks C-D and one of ground waterworks E). In each DWDS, samples were collected from three locations during four seasons of 1 year.

resultsA beta-diversity analysis revealed that the main driver shaping the eukaryotic communities was the DWDS (A-E) (R = 0.73, P < 0.001, ANOSIM). The kingdoms Chloroplastida (green plants and algae), Metazoa (animals: rotifers, nematodes), Fungi (e.g., Cryptomycota), Alveolata (ciliates, dinoflagellates), and Stramenopiles (algae Ochrophyta) were well represented and active-judging based on the rRNA gene transcripts-depending on the surrounding conditions. The unchlorinated cold water of systems (A-B) contained a higher estimated total number of taxa (Chao1, average 380-480) than chlorinated cold water in systems C-E (Chao1 ≤ 210). Within each DWDS, unique eukaryotic communities were identified at different locations as was the case also for cold water, hot water, and biofilms. A season did not have a consistent impact on the eukaryotic community among DWDSs.

conclusionsThis study comprehensively characterized the eukaryotic community members within the DWDS of well-maintained ground and surface waterworks providing good quality water. The study gives an indication that each DWDS houses a unique eukaryotic community, mainly dependent on the raw water source and water treatment processes in place at the corresponding waterworks. In particular, disinfection as well as hot water temperature seemed to represent a strong selection pressure that controlled the number of active eukaryotic species.

Indexed as

Water QualityAnimalsDrinking WaterEukaryotaFinlandGroundwaterHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDrinking WaterRNA, Ribosomal, 16S18S rRNAActive biota membersBiofilmsDisinfectionDrinking water distribution systemEukaryotic communitiesHot water systems

Identifiers

PMID31269979
PMCPMC6610866
OpenAlexW2953850642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.