Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269976›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2019

Trends in sepsis mortality over time in randomised sepsis trials: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of mortality in the control arm, 2002-2016.

Robert Luhr, Yang Cao, Bo Söderquist, Sara Cajander

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. All-cause mortality in cancer patients treated for sepsis in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Disease Trends and Mortality From Invasive Pneumococcal Disease: A Long-Term Population-Based Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert LuhrSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
Yang CaoClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
Bo SöderquistSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden.
Sara CajanderSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, Sweden. sara.cajander@regionorebrolan.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3921-4244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiologic data have shown an increasing incidence and declining mortality rate in sepsis. However, confounding effects due to differences in disease classification might have contributed to these trends. To assess if a declining mortality over time could be supported by data derived from high-quality prospective studies, we performed a meta-analysis using data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on sepsis. The primary aim was to assess whether the mortality in sepsis trials has changed over time. The secondary aim was to investigate how many of the included trials could show efficacy of the studied intervention regarding 28-day mortality.

methodsWe searched PubMed for RCTs enrolling patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, published between 2002 and 2016. The included trials were assessed for quality and sorted by date of first inclusion. A meta-analysis was performed to synthesise data from the individual sepsis trials.

resultsOf 418 eligible articles, 44 RCTs on sepsis were included in the analysis, enrolling 13,315 patients in the usual care arm between 1991 and 2013. In this time period, mortality decreased by 0.42% annually (p = 0.04) to give a total decline of 9.24%. In subgroup analyses with adjustments for APACHE II, SAPS II and SOFA scores, the observed time trend was not significant (p = 0.45, 0.23 and 0.98 respectively). Only four of the included trials showed any efficacy with regard to mortality.

conclusionsData from RCTs show a declining trend in 28-day mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients during the years from 1991 to 2013. However, when controlling for severity at study inclusion, there was no significant change in mortality over time. The number of trials presenting new treatment options was low.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42018091100 . Registered 27 August 2018.

Indexed as

Time FactorsGlobal HealthHumansMortalityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisMeta-analysisMortalityRandomised controlled trialSeptic shockSevere sepsis

Identifiers

PMID31269976
PMCPMC6610784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.