Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269955›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2019

Antimicrobial consumption in three pediatric and neonatal intensive care units in Saudi Arabia: 33-month surveillance study.

Hanan H Balkhy, Aiman El-Saed, Ali AlShehri, Mohammad Alshaalan, Omar Hijazi, Ashraf El-Metwally, Sameera M Aljohany, Saif Al Saif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CTX-M-15 PositiveInfection and drug resistance · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluating the appropriateness of carbapenem and piperacillin-tazobactam prescribing in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Review of Drug Utilization Studies in Neonatal Units: A Global Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanan H BalkhyKing Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. balkhyh@hotmail.com.
Aiman El-SaedKing Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlShehriPediatric Intensive Care, King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AlshaalanDepartment of Pediatrics, Infectious Disease Division, KAMC, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omar HijaziPediatric Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, KAMC, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ashraf El-MetwallyKing Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sameera M AljohanyPathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, KAMC, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saif Al SaifNeonatal Intensive Care, King Abdullah Specialized Children's Hospital, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite their critical role in antimicrobial stewardship programs, data on antimicrobial consumption among the pediatric and neonatal population is limited internationally and lacking in Saudi Arabia. The current study was done as part of our antimicrobial stewardship activities.

objectivesTo calculate overall and type-specific antimicrobial consumption.

methodsA prospective surveillance study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between October 2012 and June 2015 in two pediatric and one neonatal intensive care units (ICUs). Consumption data were collected manually on a daily basis by infection control practitioners. Data were presented as days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days and as frequency of daily consumption.

resultsDuring the 33 months of the study, a total of 30,110 DOTs were monitored during 4921 admissions contributing 62,606 patient-days. Cephalosporins represented 38.0% of monitored antimicrobials in pediatric ICUs followed by vancomycin (21.9%), carbapenems (14.0%), aminoglycosides (8.8%), and piperacillin/tazobactam (8.8%). Their consumption rates were 265.1, 152.6, 97.6, 61.4, and 61.4 DOTs per 1000 patient-days (respectively). Aminoglycosides represented 45.4% of monitored antimicrobials in neonatal ICU followed by cephalosporins (30.4%) vancomycin (13.6%), and carbapenems (8.3%). Their consumption rates were 147.5, 98.7, 44.3, and 27 DOTs per 1000 patient-days (respectively).

conclusionCephalosporins are frequently used in pediatric ICU while aminoglycosides are frequently used in neonatal ICU. The local consumption of cephalosporins and carbapenems in both ICUs is probably higher than international levels. Such data can help in establishing and monitoring the functions of antimicrobial stewardship activities aiming to ensure judicious consumption of antimicrobials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsCarbapenemsCephalosporinsChildChild, PreschoolCross InfectionEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMalePediatricsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCephalosporinsVancomycinAntibioticsChildrenDays of therapyDefined daily doseSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID31269955
PMCPMC6607581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.