Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269950›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Yield of systematic household contact investigation for tuberculosis in a high-burden metropolitan district of South Africa.

N Gladys Kigozi, J Christo Heunis, Michelle C Engelbrecht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Strategic approach to optimisation of TB contact investigation in Nigeria.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  8. The impact of time at home on potential yield of home-based TB contact investigation.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Determining the value of TB active case-finding: current evidence and methodological considerations.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

N Gladys KigoziCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 399, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa. kigozign@ufs.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7073-6561
J Christo HeunisCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 399, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.
Michelle C EngelbrechtCentre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, P.O. Box 399, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa.

Funding

African Doctoral Dissertation Research Fellowship (ADDRF), African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC) in partnership with International Development Research Center (IDRC) RCS/ADDRF/2014/131National Research Foundation 94116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic household contact investigation (SHCI) is recommended as an active-case-finding (ACF) strategy to identify individuals at high risk of tuberculosis (TB) infection, in order to enable early detection and treatment. Reluctance to implement SHCI in sub-Saharan African and South African high-burden contexts may stem from uncertainty about the potential yield of this strategy when targeting specific categories of TB index cases. In order to inform and motivate scale-up, this pilot study investigated the effectiveness of SHCI when targeting the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended categories of infectious index cases.

methodData were gathered in September and October 2016. Household contacts of infectious TB cases who attended 40 primary health care facilities in Mangaung Metropolitan District were recruited. The categories of TB index cases included 1) children <5 years, 2) HIV co-infected pulmonary TB (PTB) cases (≥5 years), 3) HIV-negative PTB cases (≥5 years), and 4) multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB cases. Contacts were screened for TB symptoms and symptomatic individuals and all children <5 years were referred for clinical evaluation. Data were analysed to establish the yield and factors associated with new TB diagnosis.

resultsOf 259 contacts screened, just under half (47.1%) underwent TB clinical investigation, during which 17 (6.6%) new TB cases were diagnosed, which represents a prevalence rate of 6564 per 100,000 population. Fifteen contacts needed to be screened to detect one new TB case. The proportion of new TB cases was the highest among contacts of HIV-negative PTB index cases (47.9%). The likelihood of TB diagnosis was higher among male contacts (odds ratio [OR]: 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-14.97) and those reporting coughing (OR: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.11-16.43).

conclusionThe high yield of new TB observed in this pilot study demonstrates that targeted SHCI may be an effective ACF strategy in Mangaung and similar high-burden settings in South Africa. Targeting different index case categories produced variable yield - the highest among contacts of HIV-negative TB index cases. SHCI among household contacts of all four the WHO-recommended categories of infectious TB index cases - and male and coughing contacts, in particular - should be maximised.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolContact TracingCoughFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPrevalenceSouth AfricaTuberculosisActive case findingFree State ProvinceHousehold contact investigationIndex casesMangaung Metropolitan DistrictTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31269950
PMCPMC6609408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.