Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269876›Full record

Trial reportActa orthopaedica2019

Bone remodeling of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty: secondary endpoints analyzed from a randomized trial comparing monoblock and modular tibia trays-2 year follow-up of 53 cases.

Mikkel Rathsach Andersen, Nikolaj Winther, Thomas Lind, Henrik M Schrøder, Michael Mørk Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta orthopaedica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Joint Reaction Forces Decrease Following Total Knee Arthroplasty up to 12-Months Post-Surgery.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Can Hounsfield Unit Evaluation of Preoperative CT Scans Predict Surgeon's Preference of Cementless Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty?Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mikkel Rathsach AndersenDepartment of Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen.
Nikolaj WintherDepartment of Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen.
Thomas LindDepartment of Orthopedics, Herlev Gentofte Hospital , Copenhagen , Denmark.
Henrik M SchrøderDepartment of Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen.
Michael Mørk PetersenDepartment of Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKGentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - Bone remodeling as a response to bone trauma, postoperative immobilization, and device-related bone reactions can lead to loss of bone stock and increase the risk of periprosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening. This study investigates the adaptive bone remodeling of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and methods - We performed a 2-year follow up of 53 patients (mean age 62 (38-70) years, 27 of whom were men, who received an uncemented TKA in a randomized controlled trial with bone mineral density (BMD) as secondary endpoint. Patients were randomized to 2 groups of either monoblock (A) or modular (B) polyethylene design. The TKAs were performed using the uncemented Zimmer Nexgen trabecular metal. Measurements of BMD were done postoperatively and after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. BMD was measured in 3 regions of interest (ROI). Results and interpretation - In group A statistically significant changes in BMD were seen after 24 months in both the medial and lateral ROI. BMD decreased medially by 15% (p = 0.004) and laterally by 13% (p = 0.01). In group B the BMD changes were limited and after 24 months returned to the preoperative values. The differences in BMD change between groups were statistically significant in both the medial (p = 0.03) and lateral (p = 0.02) ROI. In the distal ROI we found no significant change in BMD in either group. A significantly different bone remodeling pattern of the proximal tibia was seen in the 2 groups with a higher degree of bone loss in the knees that received the monoblock polyethylene design, indicating that the flexible monoblock implant design, previously shown to improve fixation, does not decrease the bone loss of the proximal tibia.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone DensityBone RemodelingCementationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeProsthesis DesignTibia

Identifiers

PMID31269876
PMCPMC6746298
OpenAlexW2954488893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.