Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269867›Full record

SynthesisTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease

Effect of lung recruitment and titrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)

Xi Zheng, Yijia Jiang, Huimiao Jia, Wenliang Ma, Yue Han, Wenxiong Li

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Estimation of lung recruitment characteristics using the static pressure-volume curve of lungs].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xi ZhengSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yijia JiangSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Huimiao JiaSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenliang MaSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yue HanSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenxiong LiSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 8 Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7074-1136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSetting a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) receiving mechanical ventilation has been an issue of great contention. Therefore, we aimed to determine effects of lung recruitment maneuver (RM) and titrated PEEP

methodsData sources and study selection proceeded as follows: PubMed, Ovid, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from 2003 to May 2018. Original clinical randomized controlled trials which met the eligibility criteria were included. To compare the prognosis between the titrated PEEP and low PEEP groups on patients with moderate-severe ARDS (PaO

resultsNo difference was found in 28-day mortality and ICU mortality (OR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.61-1.52),

conclusionNo difference was observed in the RM between the titrated PEEP and the low PEEP in 28-day mortality and ICU mortality on patients with moderate-severe ARDS.

Indexed as

AdultHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsPositive-Pressure RespirationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Distress SyndromeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcomeacute respiratory distress syndromemeta-analysismortalitypositive end-expiratory pressuresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31269867
PMCPMC6611025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.