Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269745›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Comparison of Radiosensitization by HDAC Inhibitors CUDC-101 and SAHA in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.

Simone Moertl, Sarah Payer, Rosemarie Kell, Klaudia Winkler, Natasa Anastasov, Michael J Atkinson

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone MoertlHelmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. moertl@helmholtz-muenchen.de.
Sarah PayerHelmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Rosemarie KellHelmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Klaudia WinklerHelmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Natasa AnastasovHelmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Michael J AtkinsonHelmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Biology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis. New treatment options are urgently required to improve patient outcomes. One promising new class of anticancer drugs are synthetic histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) which modulate chromatin structure and gene expression by blocking histone deacetylation. In this study, we aimed at comparing the in vitro capacities of the HDACi SAHA and CUDC-101 to increase radiosensitivity of human pancreatic tumor cell lines. Therefore, three pancreatic cancer cell lines (Su.86.86, MIA Paca-2, T3M-4) were treated with SAHA (1.5-5 µM) or CUDC-101 (0.25-3 µM) and after 24 h irradiated. Cell proliferation, clonogenic survival and apoptosis was determined. Additionally, cell lysates were investigated for the expression of apoptosis-related proteins. CUDC-101 and SAHA increased the radiation sensitivity of pancreatic tumor cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. This was evidenced by cell proliferation and clonogenic survival. Furthermore, enhanced radiation sensitivity after CUDC-101 or SAHA treatment was confirmed for Su.86.86 and T3M-4 cells in a 3-D microtissue approach. Increased amounts of subG1 cells and diminished full length PARP-1 suggest increased radiation-induced apoptosis after SAHA or CUDC-101 treatment. The comparison of both inhibitors in these assays manifested CUDC-101 as more potent radiosensitizer than SAHA. In line, western blot quantification of the apoptosis-inhibitory proteins XIAP and survivin showed a stronger down-regulation in response to CUDC-101 treatment than after SAHA application. These proteins may contribute to the synergy between HDAC inhibition and radiation response. In conclusion, these preclinical results suggest that treatment with the HDAC inhibitors CUDC-101 or SAHA can enhance radiation-induced cytotoxicity in human pancreatic cells. However, comparison of both inhibitors identified the multi target inhibitor CUDC-101 as more potent radiosensitizer than the HDAC inhibitor SAHA.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansHydroxamic AcidsPancreatic NeoplasmsQuinazolinesRadiation-Sensitizing Agents7-(4-(3-ethynylphenylamino)-7-methoxyquinazolin-6-yloxy)-N-hydroxyheptanamideHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHydroxamic AcidsQuinazolinesRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsapoptosisHDAC inhibitorionizing radiationpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID31269745
PMCPMC6651299
OpenAlexW2953822929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.