Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269706›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Estimation of Prevalence of Osteoporosis Using OSTA and Its Correlation with Sociodemographic Factors, Disability and Comorbidities.

Peizhi Wang, Edimansyah Abdin, Saleha Shafie, Siow Ann Chong, Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar, Mythily Subramaniam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peizhi WangResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore 539747, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7054-1879
Edimansyah AbdinResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore 539747, Singapore.
Saleha ShafieResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore 539747, Singapore.
Siow Ann ChongResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore 539747, Singapore.
Janhavi Ajit VaingankarResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore 539747, Singapore.
Mythily SubramaniamResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore 539747, Singapore.
Institute of Mental Health · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a growing concern for an aging society. The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of older adults who were at risk of osteoporosis and explore factors associated with osteoporosis. The relationship between the risk of osteoporosis, chronic conditions and disability was also explored. We hypothesized that respondents with high risk index of osteoporosis would be associated with greater disability. Participants aged 60 years and above (

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChronic DiseaseComorbidityFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPersons with DisabilitiesPrevalenceRisk FactorsSelf-AssessmentSex FactorscomorbiditiesdisabilityosteoporosisOsteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians

Identifiers

PMID31269706
PMCPMC6650858
OpenAlexW2954055814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.