Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269684›Full record

ArticleCancers2019

Monitoring Radiotherapeutic Response in Prostate Cancer Patients Using High Throughput FTIR Spectroscopy of Liquid Biopsies.

Dinesh K R Medipally, Thi Nguyet Que Nguyen, Jane Bryant, Valérie Untereiner, Ganesh D Sockalingum, Daniel Cullen, Emma Noone, Shirley Bradshaw, Marie Finn, Mary Dunne and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00951535 (A Prospective Phase II Dose Escalation Study Using IMRT for High Risk N0M0 Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00951535 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective Phase II Dose Escalation Study Using IMRT for High Risk N0M0 Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorCancer Trials IrelandRan2009 to 2026Enrolled251ConditionsProstate CancerArmsquestionnaire administration, quality-of-life assessment, image-guided radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, radiation therapy treatment planning/simulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dinesh K R MedipallyRadiation and Environmental Science Centre, Focas Research Institute, Technological University Dublin, D08 NF82 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-6353-1808
Thi Nguyet Que NguyenRadiation and Environmental Science Centre, Focas Research Institute, Technological University Dublin, D08 NF82 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-6049
Jane BryantRadiation and Environmental Science Centre, Focas Research Institute, Technological University Dublin, D08 NF82 Dublin, Ireland.
Valérie UntereinerBioSpecT EA 7506, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, UFR Pharmacie, 51097 Reims, France.
Ganesh D SockalingumBioSpecT EA 7506, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, UFR Pharmacie, 51097 Reims, France.
Daniel CullenRadiation and Environmental Science Centre, Focas Research Institute, Technological University Dublin, D08 NF82 Dublin, Ireland.
Emma NooneClinical Trials Unit, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St Luke's Hospital, D06 HH36 Dublin, Ireland.
Shirley BradshawClinical Trials Unit, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St Luke's Hospital, D06 HH36 Dublin, Ireland.
Marie FinnClinical Trials Unit, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St Luke's Hospital, D06 HH36 Dublin, Ireland.
Mary DunneClinical Trials Unit, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St Luke's Hospital, D06 HH36 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3723-6311
Aoife M ShannonCancer Trials Ireland, D11 KXN4 Dublin, Ireland.
John ArmstrongCancer Trials Ireland, D11 KXN4 Dublin, Ireland.
Fiona M LyngRadiation and Environmental Science Centre, Focas Research Institute, Technological University Dublin, D08 NF82 Dublin, Ireland. Fiona.lyng@dit.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-9876-963X
Aidan D MeadeRadiation and Environmental Science Centre, Focas Research Institute, Technological University Dublin, D08 NF82 Dublin, Ireland. Aidan.Meade@dit.ie.

Funding

EU FP7 Network of Excellence DoReMi 249689Irish Research Council GOIPG/2016/1538Science Foundation Ireland 11/RFP.1/BMT/3317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is used to treat approximately 50% of all cancer patients. However, RT causes a wide range of adverse late effects that can affect a patient's quality of life. There are currently no predictive assays in clinical use to identify patients at risk of normal tissue radiation toxicity. This study aimed to investigate the potential of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for monitoring radiotherapeutic response. Blood plasma was acquired from 53 prostate cancer patients at five different time points: prior to treatment, after hormone treatment, at the end of radiotherapy, two months post radiotherapy and eight months post radiotherapy. FTIR spectra were recorded from plasma samples at all time points and the data was analysed using MATLAB software. Discrimination was observed between spectra recorded at baseline versus follow up time points, as well as between spectra from patients showing minimal and severe acute and late toxicity using principal component analysis. A partial least squares discriminant analysis model achieved sensitivity and specificity rates ranging from 80% to 99%. This technology may have potential to monitor radiotherapeutic response in prostate cancer patients using non-invasive blood plasma samples and could lead to individualised patient radiotherapy.

Indexed as

blood plasmaFourier transform infrared spectroscopyhigh throughputprostate cancerradiotherapytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID31269684
PMCPMC6679106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.