Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269083›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparative transcriptome analysis of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) and one of its wild relatives Cajanus platycarpus (Benth.) Maesen.

Maniraj Rathinam, Pragya Mishra, Madavan Vasudevan, Roli Budhwar, Ajay Mahato, A Lakshmi Prabha, Nagendra Kumar Singh, Uma Rao, Rohini Sreevathsa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative TMT Proteomic Analysis Unveils Unique Insights intoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maniraj RathinamICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India.
Pragya MishraICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India.
Madavan VasudevanBionivid Technology Private Limited, Near New Horizon College, Kasturi Nagar, Bangalore, India.
Roli BudhwarBionivid Technology Private Limited, Near New Horizon College, Kasturi Nagar, Bangalore, India.
Ajay MahatoICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India.
A Lakshmi PrabhaDepartment of Botany, School of Life Sciences, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli, Tamilnadu, India.
Nagendra Kumar SinghICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India.
Uma RaoDivision of Nematology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, India.
Rohini SreevathsaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4171-6956
National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · INBharathidasan University · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pigeonpea is a major source of dietary protein to the vegetarian population of the Indian sub-continent. Crop improvement to mitigate biotic and abiotic stresses for realization of its potential yield and bridging yield gap is the need of the hour. Availability of limited genomic resources in the cultivated germplasm, however, is a serious bottleneck towards successful molecular breeding for the development of superior genotypes in pigeonpea. In view of this, improvement of pigeonpea can be attempted through transgenesis or by exploiting genetic resources from its wild relatives. Pigeonpea wild relatives are known to be bestowed with agronomic traits of importance; discovery and deployment of genes from them can provide a lucrative option for crop improvement. Understanding molecular signatures of wild relatives would not only provide information about the mechanism behind desired traits but also enable us to extrapolate the information to cultivated pigeonpea. The present study deals with the characterization of leaf transcriptomes of Cajanus cajan and one of its wild relatives, Cajanus platycarpus. Illumina sequencing revealed 0.11 million transcripts in both the species with an annotation of 0.09 million (82%) transcripts using BLASTX. Comparative transcriptome analyses on the whole, divulged cues about the wild relative being vigilant and agile. Gene ontology and Mapman analysis depicted higher number of transcripts in the wild relative pertaining to signaling, transcription factors and stress responsive genes. Further, networking between the differentially expressed MapMan bins demonstrated conspicuous interactions between different bins through 535 nodes (512 Genes and 23 Pathways) and 1857 edges. The authenticity of RNA-seq analysis was confirmed by qRT-PCR. The information emanating from this study can provide valuable information and resource for future translational research including genome editing to alleviate varied stresses. Further, this learning can be a platform for in-depth investigations to decipher molecular mechanisms for mitigation of various stresses in the wild relative.

Indexed as

GenomicsCajanusChromosome MappingGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31269083
PMCPMC6609033
OpenAlexW2954633813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.