Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269048›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparing alternative methods of measuring cumulative risk based on multiple risk indicators: Are there differential effects on children's externalizing problems?

Idean Ettekal, Rina D Eiden, Amanda B Nickerson, Pamela Schuetze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The dynamics of maternal scaffolding vary by cumulative risk status.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Idean EttekalDepartment of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3306-9330
Rina D EidenClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Amanda B NickersonClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Pamela SchuetzeClinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.

Funding

Maternal Substance Use and Toddler Self-RegulationR01DA013190 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EIDEN, RINA D · 2001 to 2012
$5.7M
Developmental Pathways of Violence and Substance Use in a High Risk SampleR01DA041231 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EIDEN, RINA D, NICKERSON, AMANDA BETH · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013190NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined several alternative methods to measure cumulative risk (CR) based on multiple risk indicators. Several methods for measuring CR are presented and their conceptual and methodological assumptions are assessed. More specifically, at the individual risk level, we examined the implications of various measurement approaches (i.e., dichotomous, proportion- and z-scores). At the composite level, we measured CR as an observed score, and compared this approach with two variable-centered approaches (consisting of reflective and formative indicators) and two person-centered approaches (consisting of latent class analysis and latent profile analysis). A decision tree was proposed to aid researchers in comparing and choosing the alternative methods. Using a sample of 169 low-income families (children approximately 5 years old, 51% girls; 74% African American, and their primary caregiver), we specified models to represent each of the alternative methods. Across models, the multiple risk composite was based on a set of 12 individual risk indicators including low maternal education, hunger, meal and money unpredictability, maternal psychopathology, maternal substance use, harsh parenting, family stress, and family violence. For each model, we estimated the effect size of the composite CR variable on children's externalizing problems. Results indicated that the variable-centered CR composites had larger effects than the observed summary score CR indices and the person-centered methods.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentAdolescentAdultBiostatisticsChild, PreschoolDecision TreesDevelopmental DisabilitiesDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansLatent Class AnalysisMaleMother-Child RelationsParentingPovertyPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID31269048
PMCPMC6609027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.