Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269039›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Post-war (1946-2017) population health change in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.

Dawid Gondek, David Bann, Ke Ning, Emily Grundy, George B Ploubidis

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cohort Differences in Physical Health and Disability in the United States and Europe.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Secular Trends in Height, Body Mass and Mean Menarche Age in Romanian Children and Adolescents, 1936-2016.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Debatable Top Ten Papers in Geriatric Medicine List.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dawid GondekCentre for Longitudinal Studies, Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0321-7649
David BannCentre for Longitudinal Studies, Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ke NingCentre for Longitudinal Studies, Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emily GrundyInstitute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
George B PloubidisCentre for Longitudinal Studies, Department of Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P023444/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We systematically reviewed the evidence on secular trends in main chronic conditions, disability and self-assessed general health among adults in the United Kingdom, as reported in primary/secondary care databases and population-based surveys. Searches were conducted separately for: (1) trends in age-standardised or age-specific prevalence of major non-communicable diseases, disability, and self-reported general health; (2) trends in health expectancy. The databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE/EMBASE Classic and Web of Science (all from 1946/7). The evidence was synthesised narratively. There were 39 studies reporting trends in prevalence of health conditions and 15 studies in health expectancy. We did not find evidence for improvement in the age-standardised or age-specific prevalence of any of the studied major chronic conditions over the last few decades, apart from Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Both increasing or stable prevalence rates with simultaneous rising life expectancy support the expansion of morbidity theory, meaning that people are expected to spend a greater number of years with chronic condition(s). The evidence on disability-expressed as prevalence or health expectancy-was mixed, but also appeared to support the expansion of morbidity among those aged 65 or over. The evidence on trends in disability for younger age is lacking. Across the studied period (1946-2017), the UK population endured more years with chronic morbidity and disability, which may place a serious strain on the health care system, the economy and the society.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCause of DeathChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseGlobal HealthHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesPopulation HealthSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID31269039
PMCPMC6608959
OpenAlexW2955748569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.