Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269028›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Human visual cortex is organized along two genetically opposed hierarchical gradients with unique developmental and evolutionary origins.

Jesse Gomez, Zonglei Zhen, Kevin S Weiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cortical response to transient and long-term visual field loss.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transcriptomic gradients of the human cerebellum.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesse GomezHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-2055
Zonglei ZhenBeijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6748-6434
Kevin S WeinerHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
University of California, Berkeley · USBeijing Normal University · CN

Funding

Development of Macromolecular Tissue in Visual Cortex and its Role in Neural Function and BehaviorF31EY027201 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOMEZ, JESSE LEE · 2016 to 2017
$72k
NEI NIH HHS F31 EY027201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human visual cortex is organized with striking consistency across individuals. While recent findings demonstrate an unexpected coupling between functional and cytoarchitectonic regions relative to the folding of human visual cortex, a unifying principle linking these anatomical and functional features of the cortex remains elusive. To fill this gap in knowledge, we combined independent and ground truth measurements of cytoarchitectonic regions and genetic tissue characterization within human occipitotemporal cortex. Using a data-driven approach, we examined whether differential gene expression among cytoarchitectonic areas could contribute to the arealization of occipitotemporal cortex into a hierarchy based on transcriptomics. This approach revealed two opposing gene expression gradients: one that contains a series of genes with expression magnitudes that ascend from posterior (e.g., areas human occipital [hOc]1, hOc2, hOc3, etc.) to anterior cytoarchitectonic areas (e.g., areas fusiform gyrus [FG]1-FG4) and another that contains a separate series of genes that show a descending gradient from posterior to anterior areas. Using data from the living human brain, we show that each of these gradients correlates strongly with variations in measures related to either thickness or myelination of cortex, respectively. We further reveal that these genetic gradients emerge along unique trajectories in human development: the ascending gradient is present at 10-12 gestational weeks, while the descending gradient emerges later (19-24 gestational weeks). Interestingly, it is not until early childhood (before 5 years of age) that the two expression gradients achieve their adult-like mean expression values. Additional analyses in nonhuman primates (NHPs) reveal that homologous genes do not generate the same ascending and descending expression gradients as in humans. We discuss these findings relative to previously proposed hierarchies based on functional and cytoarchitectonic features of visual cortex. Altogether, these findings bridge macroscopic features of human cytoarchitectonic areas in visual cortex with microscopic features of cellular organization and genetic expression, which, despite the complexity of this multiscale correspondence, can be described by a sparse subset (approximately 200) of genes. These findings help pinpoint the genes contributing to healthy cortical development and explicate the cortical biology distinguishing humans from other primates, as well as establishing essential groundwork for understanding future work linking genetic mutations with the function and development of the human brain.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalTranscriptomeAdultAnimalsBrainBrain MappingChildCluster AnalysisEvolution, MolecularFemaleHumansMacacaMaleVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID31269028
PMCPMC6634416
OpenAlexW2954114204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.