Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31269025›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial-1 (ImpACT-1). A single-arm feasibility study evaluating the safety and potential benefit of the Ischemic Stroke System for treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Dheeraj Khurana, Subhash Kaul, Dietmar Schneider, Attila Csanyi, Ilona Adam, Nasli R Ichaporia, Bernd Griewing, Laszlo Csiba, Attila Valikovics, Vinod Puri and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03733236 (Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial-1. A Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Ischemic Stroke System for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03733236 nacompletednot on this map

Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial-1. A Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of the Ischemic Stroke System for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrainsGateRan2006 to 2009Enrolled98ConditionsIschemic Stricture of IntestineArmsISS Active Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cerebrovascular ischemia.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Dheeraj KhuranaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5379-3089
Subhash KaulNizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Dietmar SchneiderLeipzig University, NICU & Stroke Unit, Leipzig, Germany.
Attila CsanyiAladar Petz County Teaching Hospital, Gyor, Hungary.
Ilona AdamAladar Petz County Teaching Hospital, Gyor, Hungary.
Nasli R IchaporiaJahangir Hospital, Pune, India.
Bernd GriewingNeurologische Klinik GmbH, Bad Neustadt, Germany.
Laszlo CsibaUniversity of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Attila ValikovicsB.A.Z.County Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary.
Vinod PuriGB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Hans Christoph DienerDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stefan SchwabUniversitat klinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas HetzelUniversity of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Natan BornsteinTel Aviv Medical Center,Tel Aviv, Israel.
ImpACT-1 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Ischemic Stroke System is a novel device designed to deliver stimulation to the sphenopalatine ganglion(SPG).The SPG sends parasympathetic innervations to the anterior cerebral circulation. In rat stroke models, SPG stimulation results in increased cerebral blood flow, reduced infarct volume, protects the blood brain barrier, and improved neurological outcome. We present here the results of a prospective, multinational, single-arm, feasibility study designed to assess the safety, tolerability, and potential benefit of SPG stimulation inpatients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS).

methodsPatients with anterior AIS, baseline NIHSS 7-20 and ability to initiate treatment within 24h from stroke onset, were implanted and treated with the SPG stimulation. Patients were followed up for 90 days. Effect was assessed by comparing the patient outcome to a matched population from the NINDS rt-PA trial placebo patients.

resultsNinety-eight patients were enrolled (mean age 57years, mean baseline NIHSS 12 and mean treatment time from stroke onset 19h). The observed mortality rate(12.2%), serious adverse events (SAE)incidence(23.5%) and nature of SAE were within the expected range for the population. The modified intention to treat cohort consisted of 84 patients who were compared to matched patients from the NINDS placebo arm. Patients treated with SPG stimulation had an average mRS lower by 0.76 than the historical controls(CMH test p = 0.001).

conclusionThe implantation procedure and the SPG stimulation, initiated within 24hr from stroke onset, are feasible, safe, and tolerable. The results call for a follow-up randomized trial (funded by BrainsGate; clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT03733236).

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationElectric Stimulation TherapyStrokeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Flow VelocityFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGanglia, ParasympatheticHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID31269025
PMCPMC6609146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.