Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31268492›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2019

Trends in Diverting Loop Ileostomy vs Total Abdominal Colectomy as Surgical Management for Clostridium difficile Colitis.

Yen-Yi Juo, Yas Sanaiha, Ziyad Jabaji, Peyman Benharash

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. A Review of Therapies forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Management of Severe Colitis and Toxic Megacolon.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  7. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  8. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Article
  9. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Trends inAnnals of medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Treatment ofAnnals of medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yen-Yi JuoDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Yas SanaihaDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Ziyad JabajiDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Peyman BenharashDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Diverting loop ileostomy and colonic lavage has generated much interest since it was first reported as a potential alternative to total abdominal colectomy for treating Clostridium difficile colitis in 2011. To our knowledge, few studies have validated the benefit reported in the initial description, and the association of this new approach with practice patterns has not been described. Objective: To examine the national adoption pattern and outcomes of diverting loop ileostomy vs total abdominal colectomy as treatment for fulminant C difficile colitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from hospitals participating in the National Inpatient Sample database across the United States from January 2011 to September 2015 and included 3021 adult patients who underwent surgery for C difficile colitis during the study period, comprising 2408 subtotal colectomies and 613 loop ileostomies. The data were analyzed between November 2018 and April 2019. Exposures: Loop ileostomy as surgery of choice. Main Outcomes and Measures: In-hospital mortality. Results: Of 2408 participants, 1416 (58.8%) were women, 1781 (78.4%) were white, and 627 (21.6%) were individuals of color and the mean (SD) age was 68.2 (14.8) years. During the overall study period, 613 patients (20.28%) underwent diverting loop ileostomy without total abdominal colectomy. The annual proportion of patients undergoing only diversion increased from 11.16% in 2011 to 25.30% in 2015. Significantly more loop ileostomies were performed within the first day of hospitalization, in contrast to subtotal colectomies (23.31% vs 12.21%; P < .01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rates between the 2 groups (25.98% vs 31.18%; P = .28). Conclusions and Relevance: This study demonstrates the adoption of diverting loop ileostomy to treat C difficile colitis across the United States. While fulminant C difficile colitis remains a condition with high mortality rates, no significant difference in this outcome was observed between loop ileostomy and total abdominal colectomy. Loop ileostomy may represent a viable surgical alternative to total abdominal colectomy, although the grounds for selection of treatment need to be clarified.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileAdultAgedColectomyColitisEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIleostomyMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31268492
PMCPMC6613305
OpenAlexW2953806963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.