ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2020
A network approach to prioritize conservation efforts for migratory birds.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Importance, Challenges and Solutions of a Changing Climate for Conserving Migratory Animals and the Ecosystem Services They Provide.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Identifying priority wetland sites in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway for migratory bird conservation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification and conservation of critical nodes for shorebirds based on migration network perspective.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Landscape changes elevate the risk of avian influenza virus diversification and emergence in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Stage-Specific Impacts of Climate Change on Greater White-Fronted Geese Along the East Asian Flyway.Biology · 2025Article
- STOPOVER HOTSPOTS FOR MIGRATORY BIRDS IN NORTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA.Biodiversity informatics · 2025Article
- Multispecies migratory connectivity indicates hemispheric-scale risk to bird populations from global change.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Range-wide post- and pre-breeding migratory networks of a declining neotropical-nearctic migratory bird, the blackpoll warbler.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Habitat loss exacerbates pathogen spread: An Agent-based model of avian influenza infection in migratory waterfowl.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Mapping oysters on the Pacific coast of North America: A coast-wide collaboration to inform enhanced conservation.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Habitat loss can trigger migration network collapse by isolating migratory bird breeding grounds from nonbreeding grounds. Theoretically, habitat loss can have vastly different impacts depending on the site's importance within the migratory corridor. However, migration-network connectivity and the impacts of site loss are not completely understood. We used GPS tracking data on 4 bird species in the Asian flyways to construct migration networks and proposed a framework for assessing network connectivity for migratory species. We used a node-removal process to identify stopover sites with the highest impact on connectivity. In general, migration networks with fewer stopover sites were more vulnerable to habitat loss. Node removal in order from the highest to lowest degree of habitat loss yielded an increase of network resistance similar to random removal. In contrast, resistance increased more rapidly when removing nodes in order from the highest to lowest betweenness value (quantified by the number of shortest paths passing through the specific node). We quantified the risk of migration network collapse and identified crucial sites by first selecting sites with large contributions to network connectivity and then identifying which of those sites were likely to be removed from the network (i.e., sites with habitat loss). Among these crucial sites, 42% were not designated as protected areas. Setting priorities for site protection should account for a site's position in the migration network, rather than only site-specific characteristics. Our framework for assessing migration-network connectivity enables site prioritization for conservation of migratory species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.