Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31268183›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2019

Screening and offering online programs for eating disorders: Reach, pathology, and differences across eating disorder status groups at 28 U.S. universities.

Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft, Katherine N Balantekin, Dawn M Eichen, Andrea K Graham, Grace E Monterubio, Shiri Sadeh-Sharvit, Neha J Goel, Rachael E Flatt, Kristina Saffran, Anna M Karam and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Psychotherapy utilization by United States college students.Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Ellen E Fitzsimmons-CraftDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-7064-3835
Katherine N BalantekinDepartment of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Dawn M EichenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-2177
Andrea K GrahamDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0002-9736-8906
Grace E MonterubioDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Shiri Sadeh-SharvitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6499-9034
Neha J GoelDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-8191-3359
Rachael E FlattDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Kristina SaffranDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Anna M KaramDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Marie-Laure FirebaughDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Mickey TrockelDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
C Barr TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4564-6548
Denise E WilfleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USPalo Alto University · USStanford University · USNorthwestern University · USNutrition Sciences (Belgium) · BEReichman University · ILUniversity of San Diego · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

WUSTL Transdisciplinary Pre- and Postdoctoral Training Program in Obesity and Cardiovascular DiseaseT32HL130357 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2016 to 2025
$4.3M
Using Technology to Improve Eating Disorders TreatmentR01MH100455 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, CRAIG BARR, WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
NUTRITION-BEHAVIORAL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE PREVENTIONT32HL007456 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 1985 to 2014
$2.9M
Novel Executive Function Training for ObesityK23DK114480 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EICHEN, DAWN · 2018 to 2022
$995k
Developing an Optimized Conversational Agent or "Chatbot" to Facilitate Mental Health Services Use in Individuals with Eating DisordersK08MH120341 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FITZSIMMONS-CRAFT, ELLEN E. · 2019 to 2023
$824k
Testing Intervention Strategies for Addressing Obesity and Binge EatingK01DK116925 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GRAHAM, ANDREA KASS · 2018 to 2022
$799k
Analysis of Behavioral Interventions for Pediatric ObesityF32HD089586 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GRAHAM, ANDREA KASS · 2016 to 2017
$106k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007456NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL130357NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD089586NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK116925NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK114480NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH120341NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Internet-based Healthy Body Image (HBI) Program, which uses online screening to identify individuals at low risk of, high risk of, or with an eating disorder (ED) and then directs users to tailored, evidence-based online or in-person interventions to address individuals' risk or clinical status, was deployed at 28 U.S. universities as part of a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to report on: (a) reach of HBI, (b) screen results, and (c) differences across ED status groups.

methodAll students on participating campuses ages 18 years or older were eligible, although recruitment primarily targeted undergraduate females.

resultsThe screen was completed 4,894 times, with an average of 1.9% of the undergraduate female student body on each campus taking the screen. ED risk in participating students was high-nearly 60% of students screened were identified as being at high risk for ED onset or having an ED. Key differences emerged across ED status groups on demographics, recruitment method, ED pathology, psychiatric comorbidity, and ED risk factors, highlighting increasing pathology and impairment in the high-risk group. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest efforts are needed to increase reach of programs like HBI. Results also highlight the increasing pathology and impairment in the high-risk group and the importance of programs such as HBI, which provide access to timely screening and intervention to prevent onset of clinical EDs.

Indexed as

AdultEducation, DistanceFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningStudentsUnited StatesUniversitiesYoung Adultcollege studentsdigital technologieseating disordersguided self-helppreventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID31268183
PMCPMC6996115
OpenAlexW2956009664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.