Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31268178›Full record

SynthesisJournal of inherited metabolic disease2019

Neuropsychological attributes of urea cycle disorders: A systematic review of the literature.

Susan E Waisbren, Arianna K Stefanatos, Teresa M Y Kok, Burcu Ozturk-Hismi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00237315 (Longitudinal Study of Urea Cycle Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00237315 unknown statusnot on this map

Longitudinal Study of Urea Cycle Disorders

TypeobservationalSponsorAndrea GropmanRan2006 to 2026Enrolled1,500ConditionsBrain Diseases, Metabolic, Inborn, Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Urea Cycle Disorders
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The landscape of CRISPR/Cas9 for inborn errors of metabolism.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan E WaisbrenDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arianna K StefanatosDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Teresa M Y KokHorizon Therapeutics Plc, Lake Forest, Illinois.
Burcu Ozturk-HismiDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Training (Career Development) ComponentU54HD061221 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI NAGAMANI, SANDESH CHAKRAVARTHY SREENATH · 2009 to 2023
$20.8M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD061221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are rare inherited metabolic conditions that impair the effectiveness of the urea cycle responsible for removing excess ammonia from the body. The estimated incidence of UCDs is 1:35 000 births, or approximately 113 new patients with UCD per year. This review summarizes neuropsychological outcomes among patients with the eight UCDs in reports published since 1980. Rates of intellectual disabilities published before (and including) 2000 and after 2000 were pooled and compared for each UCD. Since diagnoses for UCDs tended to occur earlier and better treatments became more readily available after the turn of the century, this assessment will characterize the extent that current management strategies have improved neuropsychological outcomes. The pooled sample included data on cognitive abilities of 1649 individuals reported in 58 citations. A total of 556 patients (34%) functioned in the range of intellectual disabilities. The decline in the proportion of intellectual disabilities in six disorders, ranged from 7% to 41%. Results from various studies differed and the cohorts varied with respect to age at symptom onset, age at diagnosis and treatment initiation, current age, severity of the metabolic deficiency, management strategies, and ethnic origins. The proportion of cases with intellectual disabilities ranged from 9% to 65% after 2000 in the seven UCDs associated with cognitive deficits. Positive outcomes from some studies suggest that it is possible to prevent or reverse the adverse impact of UCDs on neuropsychological functioning. It is time to "raise the bar" in terms of expectations for treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge of OnsetChildChild, PreschoolCognitionEuropeFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntellectual DisabilityMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsTreatment Outcomeintellectual disabilitiesneuropsychological outcomesurea cycle disorders

Identifiers

PMID31268178
PMCPMC7250134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.