Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31268130›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2019

Prognosis of microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair deficiency stage III colon cancer patients after disease recurrence following adjuvant treatment: results of an ACCENT pooled analysis of seven studies.

J Taieb, Q Shi, L Pederson, S Alberts, N Wolmark, E Van Cutsem, A de Gramont, R Kerr, A Grothey, S Lonardi and 5 more

6 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00004931 phase3completednot on this map

A Clinical Trial Comparing 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) Plus Leucovorin (LV) and Oxaliplatin With 5-FU Plus LV for the Treatment of Patients With Stages II and III Carcinoma of the Colon

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2000Enrolled2,472ConditionsStage II Colon Cancer, Stage III Colon CancerArmsleucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, laboratory biomarker analysis
NCT00026273 phase3completednot on this map

Multicenter Phase III Open Label Randomized Trial Comparing CPT-11 In Combination With A 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen To The Same 5-FU/FA Infusional Regimen Alone As Adjuvant Treatment Of Stage III Colon Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2001ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsFOLFIRI regimen, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, leucovorin calcium
NCT00079274 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized Phase III Trial of Oxaliplatin (OXAL) Plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (CF) With or Without Cetuximab (C225) After Curative Resection for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2004 to 2012Enrolled3,397ConditionsAdenocarcinoma of the Colon, Stage III Colon CancerArmsirinotecan hydrochloride, oxaliplatin, leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, cetuximab
NCT00096278 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Clinical Trial Comparing Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) Every Two Weeks With Bevacizumab to the Same Regimen Without Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Patients With Resected Stages II and III Carcinoma of the Colon

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2004 to 2012Enrolled2,710ConditionsColon Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIA Colon Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIB Colon Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIC Colon Cancer AJCC v7ArmsBevacizumab, Fluorouracil, Leucovorin Calcium, Oxaliplatin
NCT00112918 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Three Arm Multinational Phase III Study to Investigate Bevacizumab (q3w or q2w) in Combination With Either Intermittent Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin (XELOX) (q3w) or Fluorouracil/Leucovorin With Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) Versus FOLFOX-4 Regimen Alone as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Carcinoma: The AVANT Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2004 to 2012Enrolled3,451ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsBevacizumab, Capecitabine, 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), Leucovorin calcium, Oxaliplatin
NCT00265811 phase3completednot on this map

Adjuvant Treatment of Fully Resected Stage III Colon Cancer With FOLFOX-4 Versus FOLFOX-4 Plus Cetuximab

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederation Francophone de Cancerologie DigestiveRan2005 to 2010Enrolled2,559ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsFolfox, Cetuximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. ANCHOR CRC: Results From a Single-Arm, Phase II Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib and Cetuximab in Previously UntreatedJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

J TaiebDepartment of Gastroenterology and GI oncology, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Descartes, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France. Electronic address: jtaieb75@gmail.com.
Q ShiDepartment of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
L PedersonDepartment of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
S AlbertsDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
N WolmarkNational Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, USA.
E Van CutsemDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
A de GramontDepartment of Medical Oncology, Franco British Institute, Levallois Perret, France.
R KerrMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.
A GrotheyDepartment of GI Oncology, West Cancer Center, The University of Tennessee, Memphis, USA.
S LonardiDepartment of Medical Oncology Unit 1, Veneto Oncology Institute-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
T YoshinoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
G YothersDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
F A SinicropeDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, USA.
A ZaananDepartment of Gastroenterology and GI oncology, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Descartes, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
T AndréDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sorbonne Universités and Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris and Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie (GERCOR), Paris, France.

Funding

Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosatellite instable/deficient mismatch repair (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancers have been reported to have a poor prognosis. Frequent co-occurrence of MSI/dMMR and BRAFV600E complicates the association. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with resected stage III colon cancer (CC) from seven adjuvant studies with available data for disease recurrence and MMR and BRAFV600E status were analyzed. The primary end point was survival after recurrence (SAR). Associations of markers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, performance status, T stage, N stage, primary tumor location, grade, KRAS status, and timing of recurrence.

resultsAmong 2630 patients with cancer recurrence (1491 men [56.7%], mean age, 58.5 [19-85] years), multivariable analysis revealed that patients with MSI/dMMR tumors had significantly longer SAR than did patients with microsatellite stable/proficient MMR tumors (MSS/pMMR) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.69-0.98; P = 0.029). This finding remained when looking at patients treated with standard oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimens only (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-1.00; P = 0.048). Same trends for SAR were observed when analyzing MSI/dMMR versus MSS/pMMR tumor subgroups lacking BRAFV600E (aHR, 0.84; P = 0.10) or those harboring BRAFV600E (aHR, 0.88; P = 0.43), without reaching statistical significance. Furthermore, SAR was significantly shorter in tumors with BRAFV600E versus those lacking this mutation (aHR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.73-2.46; P < 0.0001), even in the subgroup of MSI/dMMR tumors (aHR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.67-4.21; P < 0.0001). Other factors associated with a shorter SAR were as follows: older age, male gender, T4/N2, proximal primary tumor location, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and early recurrence.

conclusionsIn stage III CC patients recurring after adjuvant chemotherapy, and before the era of immunotherapy, the MSI/dMMR phenotype was associated with a better SAR compared with MSS/pMMR. BRAFV600E mutation was a poor prognostic factor for both MSI/dMMR and MSS/pMMR patients. TRIAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS: NCT00079274, NCT00265811, NCT00004931, NCT00004931, NCT00026273, NCT00096278, NCT00112918.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantPrognosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColonic NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedMutationBRAF protein, humanFluorouracilKRAS protein, humanLeucovorinProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)colon cancerdeficient mismatch repairmicrosatellite instabilityprognosisrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID31268130
PMCPMC7360150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.