ReviewPersonalized medicine2019
Current applications of precision medicine: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in Personalized medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacogenetics of metamizole-induced agranulocytosis: a systematic review and drug regulation implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Knowledge mapping of photodynamic therapy in bladder cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2025).Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Global trends and hotspots in artificial intelligence for high myopia: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Augmenting digital twins with federated learning in medicine.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Article
- Targeted RNAseq Improves Clinical Diagnosis of Very Early-Onset Pediatric Immune Dysregulation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Application and Development of Intelligent Medicine in Traditional Chinese Medicine.Current medical science · 2021Article
- Neurobehavioural comorbidities of epilepsy: towards a network-based precision taxonomy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2021Review
- Article
- Defining precision health: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Social determinants of health, personalized medicine, and child maltreatment.Pediatric research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A bibliometric analysis was conducted to describe trends in the publication of precision medicine literature over time. Searches identified 5552 articles with exponential growth from 2012 to 2018. Most were published in medical specialty journals, particularly oncology. Precision medicine definitions focused on tailored/individualized/personalized treatments and genetics/biology. Little attention was given to social and environmental determinants of health and health disparities. To fulfill the promise of precision medicine to positively impact broad populations, work is needed to develop the science of precision medicine for addressing health disparities and social and environmental determinants of health. While some precision medicine definitions include all factors that contribute to individual differences in health (e.g., genes, environments and lifestyles), future empirical work that includes and integrates all three areas is also required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.