Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31267624›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of health psychology2019

What are mass media interventions made of? Exploring the active content of interventions designed to increase HIV testing in gay men within a systematic review.

Paul Flowers, Julie Riddell, Nicola Boydell, Gemma Teal, Nicky Coia, Lisa McDaid

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of health psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paul FlowersMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6239-5616
Julie RiddellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8084-4566
Nicola BoydellUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-8020
Gemma TealInnovation School, The Glasgow School of Art, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7371-3165
Nicky CoiaNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.
Lisa McDaidMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7711-8723
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBGlasgow School of Art · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CGA/17/27Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/11Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/12Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_12017/11Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_12017/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMass media HIV testing interventions are effective in increasing testing, but there has been no examination of their theory or behaviour change technique (BCT) content. Within a heterogeneous body of studies with weak evaluative designs and differing outcomes, we attempted to gain useful knowledge to shape future interventions.

methodsWithin a systematic review, following repeated requests to the authors of included studies for intervention materials, the Theory Coding Scheme, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), and Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (BCTT) were used to extract data relating to active intervention content.

resultsOf 19 studies, five reported an explicit theoretical basis to their intervention. TDF analysis highlighted the key domains employed within the majority of interventions: 'knowledge', 'social roles and identities', and 'beliefs about consequences'. BCT analysis showed three BCT groupings commonly reported within interventions: 'Comparison of outcomes', 'Natural consequences', and 'Shaping knowledge'. Three individual BCTs formed the backbone of most interventions and can be considered 'standard' content: 'Instructions on how to perform behaviour'; 'Credible source'; and 'Information about health consequences'.

conclusionsThis is the first study to examine and detail active intervention content in this field. It suggests future interventions should improve knowledge about testing, and use well-branded and trusted sources that endorse testing. Future interventions should also provide clear information about the health benefits of testing. Our analysis also suggests that to improve levels of effectiveness characterizing the current field, it may be useful to elicit commitment, and action plans, relating to how to implement testing intentions. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject? Interventions are urgently needed to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) and enable increased access to effective treatment for HIV infection. There is some evidence of the effectiveness of mass media interventions in increasing HIV testing among MSM. Nothing is known about the active components of existing mass media interventions targeting HIV testing. What does this study add? It describes the available literature concerning evaluated mass media interventions to increase HIV testing. It shows few interventions report any explicit theoretical basis although many interventions share common components, including coherently connected causal mechanisms and behaviour change techniques to moderate them. As a minimum, future interventions should improve knowledge about testing; use well-branded and trusted sources that endorse testing; and provide clear information about the health benefits of testing. Our analysis also tentatively suggests it may be useful to elicit commitment and planning of how to implement testing intentions.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleMass MediaMass ScreeningHumansIntentionMaleSexual and Gender MinoritiesYoung Adultbehaviour changebehaviour change techniquesHIV testingintervention contentmen who have sex with menreview

Identifiers

PMID31267624
PMCPMC7058418
OpenAlexW2955751601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.