Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31267542›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2019

Data needed to respond appropriately to anemia when it is a public health problem.

Anne M Williams, O Yaw Addo, Scott D Grosse, Nicholas J Kassebaum, Zane Rankin, Katherine E Ballesteros, Helen Elizabeth Olsen, Andrea J Sharma, Maria Elena Jefferds, Zuguo Mei

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne M WilliamsMcKing Consulting Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-6599-9116
O Yaw AddoDepartment of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Scott D GrosseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Nicholas J KassebaumThe Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Zane RankinThe Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Katherine E BallesterosThe Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Helen Elizabeth OlsenThe Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington.
Andrea J SharmaDivision of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Maria Elena JefferdsDivision of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Zuguo MeiDivision of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Washington · USGates Foundation · USSeattle Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Department of Nutrition for Health and Development of the World Health Organization (WHO)Evidence and Programme Guidance UnitEvidence and Programme Guidance Unit, Department of Nutrition for Health and Development of the World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, SwitzerlandIntramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the proportion of anemia amenable to change varies by population, the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria used to describe the public health severity of anemia are based on population prevalences. We describe the importance of measuring iron and other etiologic indicators to better understand what proportion of anemia could be responsive to interventions. We discuss the necessity of measuring inflammation to interpret iron biomarkers and documenting anemia of inflammation. Finally, we suggest assessing nonmodifiable genetic blood disorders associated with anemia. Using aggregated results from the Global Burden of Disease 2016, we compare population prevalence of anemia with years lived with disability (YLD) estimates, and the relative contributions of mild, moderate, and severe anemia to YLD. Anemia prevalences correlated with YLD and the relative proportion of moderate or severe anemia increased with anemia prevalence. However, individual-level survey data revealed irregular patterns between anemia prevalence, the prevalence of moderate or severe anemia, and the prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). We conclude that although the WHO population prevalence criteria used to describe the public health severity of anemia are important for policymaking, etiologic-specific metrics that take into account IDA and other causes will be necessary for effective anemia control policies.

Indexed as

Global HealthPublic HealthAnemiaHumansIronPre-Analytical PhasePrevalenceIronanemiadisability-adjusted life yearsiron deficiency anemiapublic health significance

Identifiers

PMID31267542
PMCPMC8291089
OpenAlexW2954172213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.