Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31267349›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2019

A Review of the Literature on Community Resilience and Disaster Recovery.

Brian Mayer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 'Where We Can Breathe Together': Home Perceptions and Coping Strategies of Divorced Mothers Evacuated in Wartime.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Building community resilience during COVID-19: Learning from rural Bangladesh.Journal of contingencies and crisis management · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brian MayerSchool of Sociology, College of Behavioral & Social Sciences, University of Arizona, PO Box 210027, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. brianmayer@email.arizona.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe concept of resilience continues to grow in influence and prominence in national and international programs seeking to improve individual and collective capacity to prepare for and respond to disasters. This review of the literature published in 2018 examines how disaster scholars and professionals are conceptualizing and applying the concept of community disaster resilience. RECENT

findingsThree trends in the literature on community disaster resilience are observed: (1) advancements in the measurement of resilience continue to refine the concept and its related mechanisms using both primary and secondary data, (2) social capital continues to be a central mechanism through which community resilience reduces disaster impact and enhances recovery, and (3) programs across the globe are advancing the practice of improving resilience through community interventions to enhancing adaptive capacities. Community disaster resilience offers much promise as a guiding paradigm for the promotion of disaster risk reduction and the enabling of disaster recovery through attention to, and investment in, local capacities for adaptation to a changing and uncertain environment. However, there remains work to be done in the clarification of the concept and the operationalization of the mechanisms leading to enhancing community capacity for resilience.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalResidence CharacteristicsResilience, PsychologicalCommunity ParticipationDisastersHumansResearch DesignVulnerable PopulationsCommunityDisasterInterventionMeasurementRecoveryResilienceSocial capital

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.