ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Aortic CT angiography using the double region of interest timing bolus technique: feasibility of 80 kVp scanning in lean patients.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT angiography of acute aortic syndrome in patients with chronic kidney disease.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Optimized contrast enhancement and homogeneity in aortic CT angiography: bolus tracking with personalized post-trigger delay.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the feasibility of aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed at 80 kVp in lean patients using the double region of interest timing bolus (DRTB) technique compared to 100 kVp scanning. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. We prospectively included 165 patients from July 2018 to February 2019. We used an 80 kVp protocol when the maximal tube current did not exceed the limit using automatic exposure control; otherwise, 100 kVp was selected. The scan parameters for aortic CTA were determined from the test scan data. Enhancement at six points of the aortoiliac arteries and noise at the bifurcation level were measured. We compared the enhancement and signal to noise ratio (SNR) using Student's t-test. The tube voltage was 80 kVp in 87 patients (53%). The enhancement of the aortoiliac arteries was significantly higher (449.3 ± 77.8 vs 378.7 ± 53.1 HU, p < 0.0001) and the SNR was similar (42.4 ± 11.1 vs 40.0 ± 10.6, p = 0.17), and the amount of contrast medium was lower (33.0 ± 2.5 vs 41.8 ± 3.3 ml, p < 0.001) in the 80 kVp group compared to the 100 kVp group. Reducing the tube current to 80 kVp could decrease the amount of contrast medium used compared to the 100 kVp protocol, while maintaining image quality, for aortic CTA using the DRTB technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31267264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.