Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31267264›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Aortic CT angiography using the double region of interest timing bolus technique: feasibility of 80 kVp scanning in lean patients.

Nobuo Tomizawa, Shingo Ito, Tastuya Nakao, Hiroaki Arakawa, Kodai Yamamoto, Shinichi Inoh, Takeshi Nojo, Sunao Nakamura

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CT angiography of acute aortic syndrome in patients with chronic kidney disease.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nobuo TomizawaDepartment of Radiology, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, 270-2232, Chiba, Japan. tomizawa-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-1081
Shingo ItoDepartment of Radiology, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, 270-2232, Chiba, Japan.
Tastuya NakaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, 270-2232, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroaki ArakawaDepartment of Radiology, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, 270-2232, Chiba, Japan.
Kodai YamamotoDepartment of Radiology, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, 270-2232, Chiba, Japan.
Shinichi InohDepartment of Radiology, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, 270-2232, Chiba, Japan.
Takeshi NojoDepartment of Radiology, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, 270-2232, Chiba, Japan.
Sunao NakamuraDepartment of Cardiology, New Tokyo Hospital, 1271 Wanagaya, Matsudo, 270-2232, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the feasibility of aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) performed at 80 kVp in lean patients using the double region of interest timing bolus (DRTB) technique compared to 100 kVp scanning. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. We prospectively included 165 patients from July 2018 to February 2019. We used an 80 kVp protocol when the maximal tube current did not exceed the limit using automatic exposure control; otherwise, 100 kVp was selected. The scan parameters for aortic CTA were determined from the test scan data. Enhancement at six points of the aortoiliac arteries and noise at the bifurcation level were measured. We compared the enhancement and signal to noise ratio (SNR) using Student's t-test. The tube voltage was 80 kVp in 87 patients (53%). The enhancement of the aortoiliac arteries was significantly higher (449.3 ± 77.8 vs 378.7 ± 53.1 HU, p < 0.0001) and the SNR was similar (42.4 ± 11.1 vs 40.0 ± 10.6, p = 0.17), and the amount of contrast medium was lower (33.0 ± 2.5 vs 41.8 ± 3.3 ml, p < 0.001) in the 80 kVp group compared to the 100 kVp group. Reducing the tube current to 80 kVp could decrease the amount of contrast medium used compared to the 100 kVp protocol, while maintaining image quality, for aortic CTA using the DRTB technique.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexComputed Tomography AngiographyMultidetector Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAortic DiseasesAortographyContrast MediaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInjections, IntravenousIopamidolMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediaIopamidolAortaComputed tomography angiographyContrast mediumTiming bolus technique

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.