Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31267231›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2019

Adhesion mechanisms mediated by probiotics and prebiotics and their potential impact on human health.

Andrea Monteagudo-Mera, Robert A Rastall, Glenn R Gibson, Dimitris Charalampopoulos, Afroditi Chatzifragkou

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 335 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
335citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
63.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

335 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 691 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring the Adhesion Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Human colostrum as a probiotic reservoir: a genomic insights into potential probiotic traits.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

275 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea Monteagudo-MeraBiomedical Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AH, UK. a.monteagudo@reading.ac.uk.
Robert A RastallDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 226, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK.
Glenn R GibsonDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 226, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK.
Dimitris CharalampopoulosDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 226, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK.
Afroditi ChatzifragkouDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, PO Box 226, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK. a.chatzifragkou@reading.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-7871
University of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adhesion ability to the host is a classical selection criterion for potential probiotic bacteria that could result in a transient colonisation that would help to promote immunomodulatory effects, as well as stimulate gut barrier and metabolic functions. In addition, probiotic bacteria have a potential protective role against enteropathogens through different mechanisms including production of antimicrobial compounds, reduction of pathogenic bacterial adhesion and competition for host cell binding sites. The competitive exclusion by probiotic bacteria has a beneficial effect not only on the gut but also in the urogenital tract and oral cavity. On the other hand, prebiotics may also act as barriers to pathogens and toxins by preventing their adhesion to epithelial receptors. In vitro studies with different intestinal cell lines have been widely used along the last decades to assess the adherence ability of probiotic bacteria and pathogen antagonism. However, extrapolation of these results to in vivo conditions still remains unclear, leading to the need of optimisation of more complex in vitro approaches that include interaction with the resident microbiota to address the current limitations. The aim of this mini review is to provide a comprehensive overview on the potential effect of the adhesive properties of probiotics and prebiotics on the host by focusing on the most recent findings related with adhesion and immunomodulatory and antipathogenic effect on human health.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionAntibiosisEpithelial CellsHumansImmunologic FactorsPrebioticsProbioticsImmunologic FactorsPrebioticsAdhesionImmunomodulationPathogensPrebioticsProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID31267231
PMCPMC6667406
OpenAlexW2954311903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.