ReviewDer Orthopade2019
[The modified Dunn procedure to treat severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical impairments in Adults with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) undergoing Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2022Pooled it
- [Evaluation of care for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) in Germany].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Avascular Necrosis After Modified Dunn Surgery for the Treatment of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2022Article
- Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an epidemiological Nationwide study in Italy from 2001 to 2015.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The modified Dunn procedure enables restoration of the proximal femoral anatomy and normal hip function in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Surgery is indicated in severe SCFE and in hips with a moderate slip angle and impaired function. To prevent further dislocation of the femoral head, the authors recommend non-weightbearing until surgery, since an accurate evaluation of slip stability is not possible in the clinical setting. Only a well-trained orthopedic surgeon with a high level of expertise in hip preservation surgery should perform this procedure. Precise knowledge of the vascular anatomy of the proximal femur is essential to perform successful surgery with low rates of complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Surgical hip dislocation with osteotomy of the greater trochanter is the approach used. After arthrotomy, stability of the physis is checked. To prevent rupture of the retinacular vessels in hips with an unstable physis, these heads are prophylactically pinned before dislocation out of the socket. Blood supply to the femoral head as well as intraarticular damage can be judged in the dislocated position of the femoral head. The retinacular flap preserves epiphyseal perfusion while the femoral head is dislocated from the femoral neck. Resection of posteromedial callous formation from the femoral neck as well as removal of the remaining physis from the femoral head prevent stress on the retinacular vessels after reduction of the femoral head (epiphysis) on the neck.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.