Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31267138›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study.

Joanna C D'Souza, Ash Monga, Douglas G Tincello

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Influence of previous delivery mode on perineal trauma risk.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna C D'SouzaFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. jcdsouza3@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1643-4658
Ash MongaDepartment of Urogynaecology, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Coxford Road, Southampton, SO16 5YA, UK.
Douglas G TincelloDepartment of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Princess Anne Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisVaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, specific factors that influence the risk of OASIS at VBAC have not been studied, particularly whether there are specific baseline characteristics of the first delivery which affect the subsequent perineal outcomes.

methodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from University of Southampton NHS Foundation Trusts' maternity database. This included secundiparous women with a previous caesarean delivery (CS) who achieved a singleton, term, cephalic vaginal delivery from 2004 to 2014. Univariate analysis compared maternal, intrapartum and neonatal factors of those who suffered OASIS at VBAC with those who did not. A binary logistic regression model calculated the adjusted, independent odds ratio (OR) of OASIS.

resultsA total of 1375 women met the inclusion criteria. The OASIS rate was 8.1%, a 1.4-fold increase compared with primiparous women [difference 2.4% (95% CI 1.1, 3.6)]. Those sustaining OASIS at VBAC were older (p = 0.011) and had infants of greater birth weight at initial caesarean (p < 0.001) and VBAC (p = 0.04). Analysis of odds ratios revealed that mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) at VBAC halved the risk of OASIS [37.5% VBAC with OASIS vs. 52.2% VBAC without OASIS (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81)], whereas an urgent CS at initial delivery doubled the risk [52.3% VBAC with OASIS vs. 34.9% VBAC without OASIS (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31-3.21)].

conclusionsAdvanced maternal age, increased infant birth weight and an urgent category of initial CS increase the risk of OASIS at VBAC, whereas MLE is protective.

Indexed as

AdultAnal CanalCesarean SectionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSoft Tissue InjuriesUnited KingdomVaginal Birth after CesareanYoung AdultMediolateral episiotomy (MLE)Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)Perineal traumaVaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC)

Identifiers

PMID31267138
PMCPMC6795633
OpenAlexW2955123355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.