ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal birth after caesarean: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- IUGA International Guidelines on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- High Incidence of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries among Immigrant Women of Asian Ethnicity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Influence of previous delivery mode on perineal trauma risk.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022Article
- Obstetric anal sphincter injuries-Maternal, fetal and sociodemographic risk factors: A retrospective register-based study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Observational
- Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section and risk of undergoing pelvic floor surgery: A Scottish population-based record linkage cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2022Article
- A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section: A structured review of the evidence on the associated outcomes for women and their children in high-income setting.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Obstetric anal sphincter injury following previous vaginal delivery.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Safety and feasibility of trial of vaginal labor after cesarean section: A retrospective study.Medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisVaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is associated with an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). However, specific factors that influence the risk of OASIS at VBAC have not been studied, particularly whether there are specific baseline characteristics of the first delivery which affect the subsequent perineal outcomes.
methodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from University of Southampton NHS Foundation Trusts' maternity database. This included secundiparous women with a previous caesarean delivery (CS) who achieved a singleton, term, cephalic vaginal delivery from 2004 to 2014. Univariate analysis compared maternal, intrapartum and neonatal factors of those who suffered OASIS at VBAC with those who did not. A binary logistic regression model calculated the adjusted, independent odds ratio (OR) of OASIS.
resultsA total of 1375 women met the inclusion criteria. The OASIS rate was 8.1%, a 1.4-fold increase compared with primiparous women [difference 2.4% (95% CI 1.1, 3.6)]. Those sustaining OASIS at VBAC were older (p = 0.011) and had infants of greater birth weight at initial caesarean (p < 0.001) and VBAC (p = 0.04). Analysis of odds ratios revealed that mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) at VBAC halved the risk of OASIS [37.5% VBAC with OASIS vs. 52.2% VBAC without OASIS (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81)], whereas an urgent CS at initial delivery doubled the risk [52.3% VBAC with OASIS vs. 34.9% VBAC without OASIS (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.31-3.21)].
conclusionsAdvanced maternal age, increased infant birth weight and an urgent category of initial CS increase the risk of OASIS at VBAC, whereas MLE is protective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.