ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019
Evaluation of different suspicion indices in identifying patients with Niemann-Pick disease Type C in clinical practice: a post hoc analysis of a retrospective chart review.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges in the Definitive Diagnosis of Niemann-Pick Type C-Leaky Variants and Alternative Transcripts.Genes · 2023Review
- The Antifungal Antibiotic Filipin as a Diagnostic Tool of Cholesterol Alterations in Lysosomal Storage Diseases and Neurodegenerative Disorders.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Hepatic Manifestations of Mendelian Disorders of Cholesterol Biosynthesis and Cellular Metabolism.Clinical liver disease · 2021Review
- Recessive Ataxia Differential Diagnosis Algorithm (RADIAL) Versus Specific Niemann-Pick Type C Suspicion Indices: A Retrospective Algorithm Comparison.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNiemann-Pick disease Type C (NP-C) is a lysosomal lipid storage disorder with varying symptomatology depending on the age of onset. The diagnosis of NP-C is challenging due to heterogeneous nonspecific clinical presentation of the disease. NP-C Suspicion Index (SI) was developed to aid screening and identification of patients with suspicion of NP-C for further clinical evaluation. Here we assess the performance of five NP-C SI models to identify patients with NP-C compared with clinical practice to determine the best SI model for identification of each clinical form of NP-C by age.
methodsThis was a post hoc analysis of a retrospective chart review of patient data collected from five expert NP-C centers. The study assessed the proportion of patients with NP-C who could have been identified using the Original SI, Refined SI, 2/7 SI, 2/3 SI, and Early-Onset SI and evaluated the performance of each SI against clinical practice. A score above a threshold of 70 points for the Original SI, 40 points for the Refined SI, 6 points for the Early-Onset SI, and 2 points for the 2/7 and 2/3 SIs represented identification of NP-C.
resultsThe study included 63 patients, and of these, 23.8% had a family history of NP-C. Of the available SI tools, the Refined SI performed well in identifying patients with NP-C across all age groups (77.8% infantile, 100% juvenile and 100% adult groups), and earlier identification than clinical diagnosis would have been possible in 50.0% of infantile, 72.7% of juvenile and 87.0% of adult patients. Patients who were not detected by the Refined SI prior to clinical diagnosis mainly presented with delayed developmental milestones, visceral manifestations, neurologic hypotonia, clumsiness, ataxia, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, parent or siblings with NP-C, dysarthria/dysphagia and psychotic symptoms.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the applicability of various SI models for screening and identification of patients with NP-C for further clinical evaluation. Although NP-C is rare and the patient population is limited, this study was conducted in a real-world setting and confirms SI models as useful screening tools that facilitate identification of patients with NP-C earlier in their disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.