Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31266506›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2019

A randomized controlled trial to assess the potential efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of an m-health intervention targeting parents of school aged children to improve the nutritional quality of foods packed in the lunchbox 'SWAP IT'.

Rachel Sutherland, Nicole Nathan, Alison Brown, Serene Yoong, Meghan Finch, Christophe Lecathelinais, Renee Reynolds, Alison Walton, Lisa Janssen, Clare Desmet and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Characterisation of At-Scale Community Health Interventions Aimed to Improve Healthy Eating Behaviour in Australia: A Rapid Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel SutherlandHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia. Rachel.Sutherland@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0470-7663
Nicole NathanHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Alison BrownHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Serene YoongHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Meghan FinchHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Christophe LecathelinaisHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Renee ReynoldsHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Alison WaltonHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Lisa JanssenHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Clare DesmetHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Karen GillhamHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Vanessa HerrmannHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Alix HallHunter Medical Research Institute, 1/Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
John WiggersHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScalable interventions that improve the nutritional quality of foods in children's lunchboxes have considerable potential to improve child public health nutrition. This study assessed the potential efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of an m-health intervention, 'SWAP IT', to improve the energy and nutritional quality of foods packed in children's lunchboxes.

methodsThe study employed a 2X2 factorial cluster randomized-controlled trial design. Twelve primary schools in New South Wales, Australia were randomly allocated to one of four groups: (i) no intervention;(ii) physical activity intervention only;(iii) lunchbox intervention only; or(iv) physical activity and lunchbox intervention combined. The two intervention strategies were evaluated separately. This paper focuses on the effects of the lunchbox intervention only. The lunchbox intervention comprised four strategies: 1) school nutrition guidelines; 2) lunchbox lessons; 3) information pushed to parents via a school-communication app and 4) parent resources addressing barriers to packing healthy lunchboxes. Outcome measures were taken at baseline and immediately post-intervention (10 weeks) and included measures of effectiveness (mean energy (kJ) packed in lunchboxes, total energy and percentage energy from recommended foods consistent with Australian Dietary Guidelines), feasibility (of delivering intervention to schools, parent app engagement and behaviour change) and acceptability to school staff and parents. Linear mixed models were used to assess intervention efficacy.

resultsOf the 1915 lunchbox observations, at follow-up there was no significant differences between intervention and control group in mean energy of foods packed within lunchboxes (- 118.39 kJ, CI = -307.08, 70.30, p = 0.22). There was a significant increase favouring the intervention in the secondary outcome of mean lunchbox energy from recommended foods (79.21 kJ, CI = 1.99, 156.43, p = 0.04), and a non-significant increase in percentage of lunchbox energy from recommended foods in intervention schools (4.57%, CI = -0.52, 9.66, p = 0.08). The views of the messages pushed via the app ranged from 387 to 1550 views per week (mean views =1025 per week). A large proportion (71%) of parents reported awareness of the intervention, making healthier swaps in the lunchbox (55%), and pushed content was helpful (84%).

conclusionThe study is the first RCT to assess the potential of a multi-component m-health lunchbox intervention. The intervention was feasible, acceptable and potentially effective in improving the nutritional quality of foods packed within children's lunchboxes.

trial registrationAustralian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN: ACTRN12616001228471 .

Indexed as

MealsNutritive ValueChildFeasibility StudiesFood PreferencesHealth PromotionHumansNew South WalesParentsSchoolsChildhood obesityChild nutritionChildrenLunchboxesM-healthSchools

Identifiers

PMID31266506
PMCPMC6604241
OpenAlexW2955129968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.