ArticleBMC women's health2019
Correlates of regret with treatment decision-making among Japanese women with breast cancer: results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of a web-based decision aid on breast cancer patients considering a breast reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.BMC women's health · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of decision aids on decisional conflict and treatment or disease knowledge among women diagnosed with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Decision regret in patients with rectal cancer undergoing multimodal therapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Fertility information needs and influencing factors among married women of childbearing age with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Fertility information support experiences of spouses of young breast cancer patients in China: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Shared decision-making in urinary reconstruction among radical cystectomy patients: a thematic analysis of patient and provider perspectives in China.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Decision Regret About Treatment Amongst Women With Early Breast Cancer: An Integrative Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Review
- The relationship between decision regret, quality of life, and mindfulness in early-stage breast cancer survivors.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Article
- Treatment options for patients with pilonidal sinus disease: PITSTOP, a mixed-methods evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Observational
- Decision regret of cancer patients after radiotherapy: results from a cross-sectional observational study at a large tertiary cancer center in Germany.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Observational
- Satisfaction survey on a preoperative explanation method using three-dimensional breast imaging for breast cancer patients considering breast-conserving surgery.Surgery today · 2023Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Pancreatic Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022Article
- Decision regret regarding treatments among women with early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Surgery decision conflict and its related factors among newly diagnosed early breast cancer patients in China: A cross-sectional study.Nursing open · 2021Article
- The Effects of Advance Care Planning on Decision Conflict and Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2021Article
- What Japanese Women with Breast Cancer Decide: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Web-Based Open-Ended Responses.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- [Decision regret analysis among Chinese patients receiving penile girth enhancement with acellular dermal matrix].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSatisfaction with medical decisions among patients with cancer is associated not only with the results of decisions they make but also with how they make those decisions. To elucidate the decision-making process among Japanese women with breast cancer, we explored the correlates of regret with patients' treatment decision-making.
methodsAn Internet-based cross-sectional survey was utilized. Japanese women (N = 467) who self-reported that they had been diagnosed with stage 0-II breast cancer participated. Data regarding their decisional role (active, collaborative, or passive) in treatment decision-making, their most regrettable experience regarding their decision-making, the importance of various factors related to decision-making at the time, and clinical and sociodemographic factors were obtained. A forced-entry logistic regression analysis was performed on the likelihood that patients would have some regrets regarding the decision-making process.
resultsAbout half the women expressed some regret (51.4%). Women who had a mastectomy were significantly more likely to have regret than women who had breast conserving surgery. Correlates of regret differed by surgical type. For women who had a mastectomy, those who were aged ≥50 years when diagnosed, or who made their decisions collaboratively with their doctors were significantly less likely to have regret with the decision-making. For women who had breast conserving surgery, those who worked on a contract or part-time basis or whose decision-making roles matched their preferred role were significantly less likely to have regret. Among women who reported some regret, 23.8% expressed that their most regrettable experience concerned gathering information, while 21.3% regretted not consulting with others. For women who were diagnosed at a younger age, the influence on their sex life and pregnancy and childbirth was more important when making their treatment decisions than for women diagnosed an older age.
conclusionsApproximately half of the Japanese women with breast cancer in this study reported some regret in the treatment decision-making process. Effective participation in decision-making differed by surgical types. Additionally, women who are diagnosed with breast cancer at a relatively younger age, as compared to those who are older, may need additional information and support regarding their sex life and fertility after cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.