Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31266493›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2019

Correlates of regret with treatment decision-making among Japanese women with breast cancer: results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey.

Keiko Yamauchi, Motoyuki Nakao, Mitsuyo Nakashima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Decision regret in patients with rectal cancer undergoing multimodal therapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Shared Decision-Making in Pancreatic Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Decision regret analysis among Chinese patients receiving penile girth enhancement with acellular dermal matrix].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Keiko YamauchiDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kurume University, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan. yamauchi_keiko@med.kurume-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-0909-5280
Motoyuki NakaoDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kurume University, 67 Asahimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan.
Mitsuyo NakashimaDepartment of Nursing, School of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kurume University · JPFukuoka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSatisfaction with medical decisions among patients with cancer is associated not only with the results of decisions they make but also with how they make those decisions. To elucidate the decision-making process among Japanese women with breast cancer, we explored the correlates of regret with patients' treatment decision-making.

methodsAn Internet-based cross-sectional survey was utilized. Japanese women (N = 467) who self-reported that they had been diagnosed with stage 0-II breast cancer participated. Data regarding their decisional role (active, collaborative, or passive) in treatment decision-making, their most regrettable experience regarding their decision-making, the importance of various factors related to decision-making at the time, and clinical and sociodemographic factors were obtained. A forced-entry logistic regression analysis was performed on the likelihood that patients would have some regrets regarding the decision-making process.

resultsAbout half the women expressed some regret (51.4%). Women who had a mastectomy were significantly more likely to have regret than women who had breast conserving surgery. Correlates of regret differed by surgical type. For women who had a mastectomy, those who were aged ≥50 years when diagnosed, or who made their decisions collaboratively with their doctors were significantly less likely to have regret with the decision-making. For women who had breast conserving surgery, those who worked on a contract or part-time basis or whose decision-making roles matched their preferred role were significantly less likely to have regret. Among women who reported some regret, 23.8% expressed that their most regrettable experience concerned gathering information, while 21.3% regretted not consulting with others. For women who were diagnosed at a younger age, the influence on their sex life and pregnancy and childbirth was more important when making their treatment decisions than for women diagnosed an older age.

conclusionsApproximately half of the Japanese women with breast cancer in this study reported some regret in the treatment decision-making process. Effective participation in decision-making differed by surgical types. Additionally, women who are diagnosed with breast cancer at a relatively younger age, as compared to those who are older, may need additional information and support regarding their sex life and fertility after cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmotionsAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerDecisional regretDecisional roleDecision-makingJapanese women

Identifiers

PMID31266493
PMCPMC6607591
OpenAlexW2954840235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.