Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31266483›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2019

Application of dynamic optimisation for planning a haemodialysis process.

Wojciech Stecz, Radoslaw Pytlak, Aleksandra Rymarz, Stanislaw Niemczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wojciech SteczMilitary University of Technology, Faculty of Cybernetics, Kaliskiego 2, Warsaw, 00-908, Poland. Wojciech.Stecz@wat.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-5353-5362
Radoslaw PytlakWarsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Koszykowa 75, Warsaw, 00-662, Poland.
Aleksandra RymarzMilitary Institute of Medicine, Szaserow 128, Warsaw, 04-141, Poland.
Stanislaw NiemczykMilitary Institute of Medicine, Szaserow 128, Warsaw, 04-141, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study is to show that optimization tools can be used in planning the haemodialysis process in order to obtain the most effective treatment aimed at removing both urea and phosphorus. To this end we use the IV-compartment model of phosphorus kinetics.

methodsThe use of the IV-compartment model of phosphorus kinetics forces us to apply new numerical tools which cope with a rebound phenomenon that can occur during haemodialysis. The proposed algorithm solves optimization problems with various constraints imposed on concentrations of urea and phosphorus.

resultsWe show that the optimization tools are effective in planning haemodialysis processes aimed at achieving desired levels of urea and phosphorus concentrations at the end of these processes. One of the numerical experiments reported in the paper concerns patients data who experienced a rebound phenomenon during haemodialysis due to a low level of phosphorus concentration.

conclusionIn order to plan haemodialysis processes one should take into account the fact that these processes, in general, are described by different equations in different regions determined by phosphorus concentrations. This follows from the fact that mechanisms modelled by IV-compartment model are activated during dialysis. Therefore, advanced numerical tools have to be used in order to simulate and optimize these processes. The paper shows that these tools can be constructed and effectively applied in planning haemodialysis processes.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalHumansKineticsPhosphorusRenal DialysisPhosphorusDynamic optimisationHaemodialysis planningIV-compartment model

Identifiers

PMID31266483
PMCPMC6604306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.