Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31266476›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Using ecological socioeconomic position (SEP) measures to deal with sample bias introduced by incomplete individual-level measures: inequalities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis as an example.

Sébastien Lamy, Florence Molinié, Laetitia Daubisse-Marliac, Anne Cowppli-Bony, Stéphanie Ayrault-Piault, Evelyne Fournier, Anne-Sophie Woronoff, Cyrille Delpierre, Pascale Grosclaude

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inherent Bias in Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review of Sources of Bias.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sébastien LamyLaboratory of Epidemiology and Analyses in Public Health, Faculté de Médecine, UMR 1027 Inserm - Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Equipe EQUITY labellisée par le Ligue nationale contre le cancer, 37 allées Jules Guesde, F-31000, Toulouse, France. sebastien.lamy@inserm.fr.
Florence MoliniéFrench network of Cancer registries (Francim), F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Laetitia Daubisse-MarliacLaboratory of Epidemiology and Analyses in Public Health, Faculté de Médecine, UMR 1027 Inserm - Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Equipe EQUITY labellisée par le Ligue nationale contre le cancer, 37 allées Jules Guesde, F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Anne Cowppli-BonyFrench network of Cancer registries (Francim), F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Stéphanie Ayrault-PiaultFrench network of Cancer registries (Francim), F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Evelyne FournierFrench network of Cancer registries (Francim), F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Anne-Sophie WoronoffFrench network of Cancer registries (Francim), F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Cyrille DelpierreLaboratory of Epidemiology and Analyses in Public Health, Faculté de Médecine, UMR 1027 Inserm - Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Equipe EQUITY labellisée par le Ligue nationale contre le cancer, 37 allées Jules Guesde, F-31000, Toulouse, France.
Pascale GrosclaudeLaboratory of Epidemiology and Analyses in Public Health, Faculté de Médecine, UMR 1027 Inserm - Université Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Equipe EQUITY labellisée par le Ligue nationale contre le cancer, 37 allées Jules Guesde, F-31000, Toulouse, France.

Funding

Direction Générale de l'offre de Soins PHRCLigue Contre le Cancer équipe labellisée
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen studying the influence of socioeconomic position (SEP) on health from data where individual-level SEP measures may be missing, ecological measures of SEP may prove helpful. In this paper, we illustrate the best use of ecological-level measures of SEP to deal with incomplete individual level data. To do this we have taken the example of a study examining the relationship between SEP and breast cancer (BC) stage at diagnosis.

methodsUsing population based-registry data, all women over 18 years newly diagnosed with a primary BC in 2007 were included. We compared the association between advanced stage at diagnosis and individual SEP containing missing data with an ecological level SEP measure without missing data. We used three modelling strategies, 1/ based on patients with complete data for individual-SEP (n = 1218), or 2/ on all patients (n = 1644) using an ecological-level SEP as proxy for individual SEP and 3/ individual-SEP after imputation of missing data using an ecological-level SEP.

resultsThe results obtained from these models demonstrate that selection bias was introduced in the sample where only patients with complete individual SEP were included. This bias is redressed by using ecological-level SEP to impute missing data for individual SEP on all patients. Such a strategy helps to avoid an ecological bias due to the use of aggregated data to infer to individual level.

conclusionWhen individual data are incomplete, we demonstrate the usefulness of an ecological index to assess and redress potential selection bias by using it to impute missing individual SEP.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesSelection BiasSocial ClassAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRegistriesCancerDeprivationMethodologyPopulation-based dataSocial inequalities

Identifiers

PMID31266476
PMCPMC6604477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.