Trial reportBMC cancer2019
MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02993068 (Stand up to Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Stand up to Cancer: MAGENTA (Making Genetic Testing Accessible)
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis of outcomes associated with cancer genetic counseling.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Pretest Video Education Versus Genetic Counseling for Patients With Prostate Cancer: ProGen, A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial.JCO oncology practice · 2023Trial
- Novel Models of Genetic Education and Testing for Pancreatic Cancer Interception: Preliminary Results from the GENERATE Study.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021Trial
- Psychological and behavioural considerations for integrating polygenic risk scores for disease into clinical practice.Nature human behaviour · 2025Review
- Patient-reported outcomes for remote and in-person visits for genetic counseling in adult neurology.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Call to action for genetic counseling research in hereditary cancer: Considerations from the evidence-based guidelines development process.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Article
- A novel system to provide information via online YouTube videos and an evaluation of current online information about hereditary breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Management of PALB2-associated breast cancer: A literature review and case report.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Navigating the genetic landscape of breast cancer in South Africa amidst a developing healthcare system.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- An Accessible Communication System for Population-Based Genetic Testing: Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Psychosocial impact of proactive rapid genetic counseling following breast cancer diagnosis.Psycho-oncology · 2022Article
- Review
- Response to Carlson.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Genetic Service Delivery Models: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2021Article
- Online BRCA1/2 screening in the Australian Jewish community: a qualitative study.Journal of community genetics · 2020Article
- Implementation considerations for offering personal genomic risk information to the public: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2020Article
- Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies have consistently indicated that the majority of individuals meeting the US Prevention Services Task Force guidelines for genetic testing have not had genetic counseling or testing. Despite increased availability and lower costs of multiplex cancer gene panels, there remains a gap in genetics services that has not been addressed by the current care delivery models. Lower cost of DNA sequencing with online patient-initiated ordering could increase test availability, but the ideal quantity and delivery method of patient education is not known. We hypothesized that online genetic education and testing with access to board certified genetic counselors could improve access to genetic testing while maintaining test quality and clinical utility. The MAGENTA (MAking GENetic Testing Accessible) trial is a nationwide randomized study designed to compare the effectiveness of online genetic education with pre- and post-test telephone genetic counseling to three potentially more accessible alternative approaches: online genetic education with optional telephone counseling, online genetic education with required pre-test telephone genetic counseling, and online genetic education with required post-test telephone genetic counseling.
methods3000 women nationwide will undergo genetic testing for 19 hereditary cancer genes. This is a randomized four-arm non-inferiority study with equal randomization. The four study arms were selected to independently assess the delivery of genetic information both before and after genetic testing (pre-test and post-test) by either requiring telephone genetic counseling or providing only online education with optional telephone counseling. Patients have post-test telephone counseling when testing positive for a pathogenic inherited mutation in all four arms. Surveys measuring psychological, behavioral and cognitive state are completed online at baseline, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-results disclosure. The primary study outcome is cancer-risk distress at 3 months post-result disclosure. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the use of a genetic service model using online access and electronic education, while evaluating the need for personal pre- and post-test genetic counseling. Data from this study may lead to increased options for delivery of genetic testing and possibly increase access to genetic testing. Identifying more individuals with inherited cancer susceptibility will allow targeted cancer prevention.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT02993068 (registered December 14, 2016).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.