Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31266460›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2019

MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing.

Nadine Rayes, Deborah J Bowen, Tara Coffin, Denise Nebgen, Christine Peterson, Mark F Munsell, Kathleen Gavin, Rebecca Lechner, Jamie Crase, Deborah Polinsky and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02993068 (Stand up to Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02993068 nasuspendednot on this map

Stand up to Cancer: MAGENTA (Making Genetic Testing Accessible)

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2017 to 2028Enrolled5,200ConditionsBARD1 Gene Mutation, BRCA1 Gene Mutation, BRCA2 Gene Mutation, BRIP1 Gene MutationArmsEducational Intervention, Genetic Counseling, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Questionnaire Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis of outcomes associated with cancer genetic counseling.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Response to Carlson.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Nadine RayesUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. nrayes@mdanderson.org.
Deborah J BowenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
Tara CoffinUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
Denise NebgenUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Christine PetersonUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Mark F MunsellUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Kathleen GavinMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance, Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA.
Rebecca LechnerMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance, Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA.
Jamie CrasePatient Advocate, Mercer Island, WA, 98040, USA.
Deborah PolinskyFacing our Risk of Cancer Empowered, Tampa, Florida, 33647, USA.
Iris RomeroUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Stephanie V BlankIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Douglas A LevineNew York University, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Barbara M NorquistUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
Elizabeth M SwisherUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA.
Karen H LuUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington · USFacing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMinnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance · USNew York University · USOvarian Cancer Research Alliance · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have consistently indicated that the majority of individuals meeting the US Prevention Services Task Force guidelines for genetic testing have not had genetic counseling or testing. Despite increased availability and lower costs of multiplex cancer gene panels, there remains a gap in genetics services that has not been addressed by the current care delivery models. Lower cost of DNA sequencing with online patient-initiated ordering could increase test availability, but the ideal quantity and delivery method of patient education is not known. We hypothesized that online genetic education and testing with access to board certified genetic counselors could improve access to genetic testing while maintaining test quality and clinical utility. The MAGENTA (MAking GENetic Testing Accessible) trial is a nationwide randomized study designed to compare the effectiveness of online genetic education with pre- and post-test telephone genetic counseling to three potentially more accessible alternative approaches: online genetic education with optional telephone counseling, online genetic education with required pre-test telephone genetic counseling, and online genetic education with required post-test telephone genetic counseling.

methods3000 women nationwide will undergo genetic testing for 19 hereditary cancer genes. This is a randomized four-arm non-inferiority study with equal randomization. The four study arms were selected to independently assess the delivery of genetic information both before and after genetic testing (pre-test and post-test) by either requiring telephone genetic counseling or providing only online education with optional telephone counseling. Patients have post-test telephone counseling when testing positive for a pathogenic inherited mutation in all four arms. Surveys measuring psychological, behavioral and cognitive state are completed online at baseline, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months post-results disclosure. The primary study outcome is cancer-risk distress at 3 months post-result disclosure. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess the use of a genetic service model using online access and electronic education, while evaluating the need for personal pre- and post-test genetic counseling. Data from this study may lead to increased options for delivery of genetic testing and possibly increase access to genetic testing. Identifying more individuals with inherited cancer susceptibility will allow targeted cancer prevention.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT02993068 (registered December 14, 2016).

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHealth Services AccessibilityInternetTelephoneAdultFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansOvarian NeoplasmsProspective StudiesUnited StatesGenetic counselingGenetic testingHereditary cancerOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID31266460
PMCPMC6604336
OpenAlexW2953905073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.