Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31266421›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2019

An optogenetic analogue of second-order reinforcement in Drosophila.

Christian König, Afshin Khalili, Thomas Niewalda, Shiqiang Gao, Bertram Gerber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Stabilized Ion Selectivity Corrects Activation Drift in Kalium Channelrhodopsins.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cognitive limits of larvalLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. IR76b-expressing neurons inBiology letters · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Rewarding Capacity of Optogenetically Activating a Giant GABAergic Central-Brain Interneuron in LarvalThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Reward expectations direct learning and drive operant matching inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Identification ofOpen biology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian König1 Department Genetics of Learning and Memory, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN) , Brenneckestrasse 6, 39118 Magdeburg , Germany.
Afshin Khalili1 Department Genetics of Learning and Memory, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN) , Brenneckestrasse 6, 39118 Magdeburg , Germany.
Thomas Niewalda1 Department Genetics of Learning and Memory, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN) , Brenneckestrasse 6, 39118 Magdeburg , Germany.
Shiqiang Gao2 Julius-von-Sachs-Institute, University of Würzburg , Julius-von-Sachs Platz 2, 97082 Würzburg , Germany.
Bertram Gerber1 Department Genetics of Learning and Memory, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN) , Brenneckestrasse 6, 39118 Magdeburg , Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In insects, odours are coded by the combinatorial activation of ascending pathways, including their third-order representation in mushroom body Kenyon cells. Kenyon cells also receive intersecting input from ascending and mostly dopaminergic reinforcement pathways. Indeed, in Drosophila, presenting an odour together with activation of the dopaminergic mushroom body input neuron PPL1-01 leads to a weakening of the synapse between Kenyon cells and the approach-promoting mushroom body output neuron MBON-11. As a result of such weakened approach tendencies, flies avoid the shock-predicting odour in a subsequent choice test. Thus, increased activity in PPL1-01 stands for punishment, whereas reduced activity in MBON-11 stands for predicted punishment. Given that punishment-predictors can themselves serve as punishments of second order, we tested whether presenting an odour together with the optogenetic silencing of MBON-11 would lead to learned odour avoidance, and found this to be the case. In turn, the optogenetic activation of MBON-11 together with odour presentation led to learned odour approach. Thus, manipulating activity in MBON-11 can be an analogue of predicted, second-order reinforcement.

Indexed as

DrosophilaOptogeneticsAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterLearningMushroom BodiesOdorantsdopamineDrosophila melanogastermushroom bodypredictionreinforcementsecond-order conditioning

Identifiers

PMID31266421
PMCPMC6684970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.