ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Impact of Marital Status on the Outcome of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results From the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of the association between marital status and hypertension: evaluating the impact of age and gender.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2026Review
- Association of Social Determinants of Health With Hospital Readmission and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study.Health literacy research and practice · 2024Article
- Association of marital/partner status with hospital readmission among young adults with acute myocardial infarction.PloS one · 2024Article
- Comparisons of Patients Living Alone versus Living with Others in Acute Coronary Syndrome.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2023Article
- Marital status impact on the outcomes of patients admitted for acute decompensation of heart failure: A retrospective, single-center, analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- The Association between Marital Status and Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized with Heart Failure.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of Marital Status on Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Article
- Predictors of Mortality for Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infraction after 2-Year Follow-Up: A ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Cohort in Isfahan Study.Advanced biomedical research · 2022Article
- Impact of Marital Status on the Outcome of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results From the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Meta-analysis of the association between marital status and cardiovascular diseases.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Marriage is one of the common forms of social support. Conflicting evidence exists about the impact of marital status on the outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ). It is further not clear if sex disparity exists in the outcome of married and nonmarried patients with ACS. Methods and Results Data from the ACS Israeli Survey, collected between 2004 and 2016, were used to compare baseline characteristics, clinical indexes, and outcomes of married and nonmarried patients with ACS. Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching were used to explore if marital status was independently associated with long-term outcome. Of 7233 patients included with reported marital status, 5643 (78%) were married. Married patients were younger (62.69±12.07 versus 68.47±14.84 years; P<0.001), more frequently men (83.1% versus 54.8%; P<0.001), and less likely to be hypertensive (61.1% versus 69.3%; P<0.001). All-cause mortality incidence at 30 days and at 1 year was lower in married patients (3.1% versus 7.6% [ P<0.001]; and 7.1% versus 15.3% [ P<0.001], respectively). After adjusting for multiple covariates, the hazard ratio for 5-year all-cause mortality for married patients was 0.74 (95% CI , 0.62-0.88). Similar results were observed after propensity score matching. Kaplan-Meier estimates for all-cause mortality at 5 years demonstrated the best prognosis for married men and the worst for nonmarried women. Conclusions Marriage is independently associated with better short- and long-term outcomes across the spectrum of ACS . Attempts to intensify secondary prevention measures should focus on nonmarried patients and especially nonmarried women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.