Trial reportCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2019
Sustained responses to lasmiditan: Results from post-hoc analyses of two Phase 3 randomized clinical trials for acute treatment of migraine.
Trial report in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study of Two Doses of LAsMiditan (100 mg and 200 mg) Compared to Placebo in the AcUte Treatment of MigRAIne: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study
A Study of Three Doses of Lasmiditan (50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg) Compared to Placebo in the Acute TReaTment of MigrAiNe: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study (SPARTAN)
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Acute and preventive treatment of menstrual migraine: a meta-analysis.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Receptor Antagonists and Selective Serotonin Receptor Agonist in the Management of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024Pooled it
- Lasmiditan for Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.CNS drugs · 2020Pooled it
- Phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine in Japanese patients.Headache · 2021Trial
- Novel optimization of multi-mechanistic approaches for the acute treatment of a migraine attack: A review.Headache · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and tolerability of lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine: a real-world, prospective, multicentric study (DART study).Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- Profile of Lasmiditan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adults: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2023Review
- New Oral Drugs for Migraine.CNS drugs · 2022Review
- New Approaches to Shifting the Migraine Treatment Paradigm.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Lasmiditan: Acute Migraine Treatment Without Vasoconstriction. A Review.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2021Review
- Improvement in Function after Lasmiditan Treatment: Post Hoc Analysis of Data from Phase 3 Studies.Neurology and therapy · 2020Article
- The potential of lasmiditan in migraine.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSustained pain freedom is an important attribute of acute migraine therapies for patients and physicians. Here we report efficacy of the centrally penetrant, highly selective, 5-HT STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsData from the similarly designed, Phase 3, double-blind studies SAMURAI (NCT02439320) and SPARTAN (NCT02605174) were pooled to more precisely estimate efficacy effects in these post-hoc analyses. In both studies, inclusion criteria were 3-8 migraine attacks per month and Migraine Disability Assessment Score of ≥ 11 (at least moderate disability). Patients were randomized equally to lasmiditan 200 mg, 100 mg, 50 mg (50 mg only in SPARTAN), or to placebo. The study drug was to be taken within 4 hours of onset of pain for non-improving headache of at least moderate severity. Sustained pain freedom was defined as being pain free at 2 hours and at the given time point (24 or 48 hours) post-dose without use of additional study drug or migraine medications. Sustained responses were assessed similarly for most bothersome symptom-free, total migraine-free, and disability-free outcomes. For comparisons with previously published data on other acute medications, an additional endpoint of modified sustained pain freedom at 24 hours was defined as being pain free at 2 hours and no moderate-to-severe headache at 24 hours post-dose without use of additional study drug or migraine medications.
resultsSignificantly higher proportions of patients treated with lasmiditan versus placebo achieved headache pain freedom at 2 hours post-dose: 200 mg: 35.6%; 100 mg: 29.9%; 50 mg: 28.6%; placebo: 18.3% (all
conclusionSustained responses at 24 and 48 hours were noted in significantly more patients treated with lasmiditan versus placebo for several efficacy outcomes including pain freedom, most bothersome symptom-free, total migraine-free and disability-free responses. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NUMBERS: SAMURAI: NCT02439320; SPARTAN: NCT02605174.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.