Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31265996›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2019

Measurement of urinary 5-HIAA: correlation between spot versus 24-h urine collection.

Matilde Calanchini, Michael Tadman, Jesper Krogh, Andrea Fabbri, Ashley Grossman, Brian Shine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matilde CalanchiniOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael TadmanOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jesper KroghOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrea FabbriEndocrinology & Metabolism Unit, CTO A. Alesini Hospital ASL Roma 2, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Ashley GrossmanOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Brian ShineOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Churchill Hospital · GBCTO Andrea Alesini · ITOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 24-h urinary output of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) is used to monitor disease progression and treatment responses of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Several conditions are required for 5-HIAA assay, involving urine collection/preservation and food/drug restrictions.

aimTo evaluate the correlation between 5-HIAA concentration in a spot urine sample and the output in a 24-h urine collection, and whether spot urine specimens can replace 24-h collection.

methodsPatients with NENs or symptoms suggestive of NENs were asked to provide a separate spot urine at the end of the 24-h urine collection for 5-HIAA assessment. The upper reference limit for 24-h urinary 5-HIAA was 40 µmol/24 h. 5-HIAA measurements in spot urine samples were corrected for variation in urine flow rate by expressing results as a ratio to creatinine concentration.

resultsWe included 136 paired urinary samples for 5-HIAA assessment from 111 patients (100 NENs). The correlation between 5-HIAA values measured in 24-h and spot urines was r = +0.863 (P < 0.001) and r = +0.840 (P < 0.001) including only NEN patients. Using the 24-h urinary 5-HIAA as reference method, the AUC on ROC analysis for spot urinary 5-HIAA was 0.948 (95% CI, 0.914-0.983; P < 0.001), attaining a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 95% using 5.3 mol/mmol as cut-off for the spot urine. The AUC among NEN patients alone was 0.945 (95% CI, 0.904-0.987; P < 0.001).

conclusionsThe ratio of 5-HIAA to creatinine in a spot urine could replace the measurement of 5-HIAA output in a 24-h urine collection, especially for follow-up of patients with known elevated 5-HIAA levels.

Indexed as

5-HIAA5-hydroxyindoleacetic acidcarcinoid heartcarcinoid syndromeneuroendocrine tumours

Identifiers

PMID31265996
PMCPMC6652243
OpenAlexW2954622247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.