Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31265947›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2019

Anticancer Drug Response Prediction in Cell Lines Using Weighted Graph Regularized Matrix Factorization.

Na-Na Guan, Yan Zhao, Chun-Chun Wang, Jian-Qiang Li, Xing Chen, Xue Piao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Drug Repositioning Based on Deep Sparse Autoencoder and Drug-Disease Similarity.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Na-Na GuanCollege of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Yan ZhaoSchool of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Chun-Chun WangSchool of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Jian-Qiang LiCollege of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China. Electronic address: lijq@szu.edu.cn.
Xing ChenSchool of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China. Electronic address: xingchen@amss.ac.cn.
Xue PiaoSchool of Medical Informatics, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221004, China. Electronic address: px@xzhmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine has become a novel and rising concept, which depends much on the identification of individual genomic signatures for different patients. The cancer cell lines could reflect the "omic" diversity of primary tumors, based on which many works have been carried out to study the cancer biology and drug discovery both in experimental and computational aspects. In this work, we presented a novel method to utilize weighted graph regularized matrix factorization (WGRMF) for inferring anticancer drug response in cell lines. We constructed a p-nearest neighbor graph to sparsify drug similarity matrix and cell line similarity matrix, respectively. Using the sparsified matrices in the graph regularization terms, we performed matrix factorization to generate the latent matrices for drug and cell line. The graph regularization terms including neighbor information could help to exclude the noisy ingredient and improve the prediction accuracy. The 10-fold cross-validation was implemented, and the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), root-mean-square error (RMSE), PCCsr, and RMSEsr averaged over all drugs were calculated to evaluate the performance of WGRMF. The results on the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) dataset are 0.64 ± 0.16, 1.37 ± 0.35, 0.73 ± 0.14, and 1.71 ± 0.44 for PCC, RMSE, PCCsr, and RMSEsr in turn. And for the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) dataset, WGRMF got results of 0.72 ± 0.09, 0.56 ± 0.19, 0.79 ± 0.07, and 0.69 ± 0.19, respectively. The results showed the superiority of WGRMF compared with previous methods. Besides, based on the prediction results using the GDSC dataset, three types of case studies were carried out. The results from both cross-validation and case studies have shown the effectiveness of WGRMF on the prediction of drug response in cell lines.

Indexed as

cell linedrug responsegraph regularizationmatrix factorizationresponse prediction

Identifiers

PMID31265947
PMCPMC6610642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.