Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31265768›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical psychiatry2019

The Relevance of Sex in the Association of Synthetic Cannabinoid Use With Psychosis and Agitation in an Inpatient Population.

A Bassir Nia, Claire L Mann, Sharron Spriggs, Daniel R DeFrancisco, Steven Carbonaro, Lyla Parvez, Igor I Galynker, Charles A Perkel, Yasmin L Hurd

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Chronic adolescent exposure to cannabis in mice leads to sex-biased changes in gene expression networks across brain regions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. New psychoactive substances: a review and updates.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Bassir NiaDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Claire L MannDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Sharron SpriggsDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Daniel R DeFranciscoDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA.
Steven CarbonaroDepartment of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, USA.
Lyla ParvezDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Igor I GalynkerDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Charles A PerkelDepartment of Psychiatry, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Yasmin L HurdHess Center for Science and Medicine, 10th Floor, Room 201, 1470 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10029. Yasmin.Hurd@mssm.edu.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMount Sinai Beth Israel · US

Funding

Conduits: MSHS Translational Science HubTL1TR001434 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI GABRILOVE, JANICE L · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent evidence suggests that women are more sensitive to the effects of cannabinoids. The aim of this study was to investigate the relevance of sex in the association of synthetic cannabinoid (SC) use with psychosis and agitation.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted for patients admitted to a psychiatric unit (2014-2016) to extract information on demographic factors, use of substances, clinical symptoms, and pharmacologic treatments. Study groups were defined as SC users (anyone who reported use of SCs over the past 3 months), cannabis users (positive toxicology screen for Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]), and controls (those who denied use of SCs over the past 3 months and had negative toxicology for THC).

resultsDigital charts of 983 patients were reviewed. A total of 162 subjects reported use of SCs over the past 3 months (76% male), and 292 subjects had positive toxicology screen for THC (67% male). A total of 38.9% of SC users (n = 63) had positive urine toxicology screen for THC. SC users had higher risks of psychotic presentations (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.390; 95% CI, 1.390-8.267) and agitation (AOR = 4.643; 95% CI, 1.974-10.918) compared to the controls. While women had lower rates of psychosis than men in the cannabis and control groups, the rates were markedly potentiated with SC use to high levels (79%) approximately equal to that seen in men (80%). There was also a significant interaction between SC use and sex for agitation (AOR = 0.308; 95% CI, 0.117-0.808). Female SC users were significantly more agitated than male SC users (73.7% vs 47.6%, respectively, P = .005).

conclusionsSC users are more likely than nonusers to be psychotic or agitated in an inpatient setting. The potentiated rates of psychosis and agitation with SC use in women suggest that they may have a greater sensitivity to these synthetic compounds.​.

Indexed as

DronabinolInpatientsPsychomotor AgitationPsychoses, Substance-InducedAdultCannabinoidsFemaleHumansMalePsychotropic DrugsRisk FactorsSex FactorsSubstance Abuse DetectionUnited StatesCannabinoidsDronabinolPsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID31265768
PMCPMC8445109
OpenAlexW2956021117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.