Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31265454›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Facility management associated with improved primary health care outcomes in Ghana.

Erlyn K Macarayan, Hannah L Ratcliffe, Easmon Otupiri, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Kate Miller, Stuart R Lipsitz, Atul A Gawande, Asaf Bitton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erlyn K MacarayanAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7334-8142
Hannah L RatcliffeAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Easmon OtupiriKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-8986-1648
Lisa R HirschhornAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Kate MillerAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Stuart R LipsitzAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Atul A GawandeAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Asaf BittonAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital & Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrong primary health care (PHC) is essential for achieving universal health coverage, but in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) PHC services are of poor quality. Facility management is hypothesized to be critical for improving PHC performance, but evidence about management performance and its associations with PHC in LMICs remains limited.

methodsWe quantified management performance of PHC facilities in Ghana and assessed the experiences of women who sought care at sampled facilities. Using multi-level models, we examined associations of facility management with five process outcomes and eight experiential outcomes.

findingsOn a scale of 0 to 1, the average overall management score in Ghana was 0·76 (IQR = 0·68-0·85). Facility management was significantly associated with one process outcome and three experiential outcomes. Controlling for facility characteristics, facilities with management scores at the 90th percentile (management score = 0·90) had 22% more essential drugs compared to facilities with management scores at the 10th percentile (0·60) (p = 0·002). Positive statistically non-significant associations were also seen with three additional process outcomes-integration of family planning services (p = 0·054), family planning types provided (p = 0·067), and essential equipment availability (p = 0·104). Compared to women who sought care at facilities with management scores at the 10th percentile, women who sought care at facilities at the 90th percentile reported 8% higher ratings of trust in providers (p = 0·028), 15% higher ratings of ease of following provider's advice (p = 0·030), and 16% higher quality rating (p = 0·020). However, women who sought care in the 90th percentile facilities rated their waiting times as worse (22% lower, p = 0·039).

interpretationHigher management scores were associated with higher scores for some process and experiential outcomes. Large variations in management performance indicate the need to strengthen management practices to help realize the full potential of PHC in improving health outcomes.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareUniversal Health InsuranceAdolescentAdultFamily Planning ServicesFemaleGhanaHealth Care SurveysHealth FacilitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareRural Health ServicesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31265454
PMCPMC6605853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.