Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31265323›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2019

OCTANE: Oncology Clinical Trial Annotation Engine.

Jia Zeng, Md Abu Shufean, Yekaterina Khotskaya, Dong Yang, Michael Kahle, Amber Johnson, Vijaykumar Holla, Nora Sánchez, Kenna R Mills Shaw, Elmer V Bernstam and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetically guided precision medicine clinical decision support tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. OncoCTMiner: streamlining precision oncology trial matching via molecular profile analysis.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. OCTANE: Oncology Clinical Trial Annotation Engine.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jia ZengUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Md Abu ShufeanUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Yekaterina KhotskayaUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Dong YangUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Michael KahleUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Amber JohnsonUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Vijaykumar HollaUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Nora SánchezUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Kenna R Mills ShawUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Elmer V BernstamUniversity of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX.
Funda Meric-BernstamUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)KL2TR000370 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$4.3M
Real-time Disambiguation of Abbreviations in Clinical NotesR01LM010681 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI XU, HUA · 2010 to 2017
$3.1M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)TL1TR000369 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000370NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000369NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany targeted therapies are currently available only via clinical trials. Therefore, routine precision oncology using biomarker-based assignment to drug depends on matching patients to clinical trials. A comprehensive and up-to-date trial database is necessary for optimal patient-trial matching.

methodsWe describe processes for establishing and maintaining a clinical trial database, focusing on genomically informed trials. Furthermore, we present OCTANE (Oncology Clinical Trial Annotation Engine), an informatics framework supporting these processes in a scalable fashion. To illustrate how the framework can be applied at an institution, we describe how we implemented an instance of OCTANE at a large cancer center. OCTANE consists of three modules. The data aggregation module automates retrieval, aggregation, and update of trial information. The annotation module establishes the database schema, implements data integration necessary for automation, and provides an annotation interface. The update module monitors trial change logs, identifies critical change events, and alerts the annotators when manual intervention may be needed.

resultsUsing OCTANE, we annotated 5,439 oncology clinical trials (4,438 genomically informed trials) that collectively were associated with 1,453 drugs, 779 genes, and 252 cancer types. To date, we have used the database to screen 4,220 patients for trial eligibility. We compared the update module with expert review, and the module achieved 98.5% accuracy, 0% false-negative rate, and 2.3% false-positive rate.

conclusionOCTANE is a general informatics framework that can be helpful for establishing and maintaining a comprehensive database necessary for automating patient-trial matching, which facilitates the successful delivery of personalized cancer care on a routine basis. Several OCTANE components are publically available and may be useful to other precision oncology programs.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualDecision Support Systems, ClinicalSearch EngineHumansMedical InformaticsMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineSoftwareSoftware DesignWeb Browser

Identifiers

PMID31265323
PMCPMC6873935
OpenAlexW2955781709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.