Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31265316›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2019

Deep inspiration breath-hold intensity modulated radiation therapy in a large clinical series of 239 left-sided breast cancer patients: a dosimetric analysis of organs at risk doses and clinical feasibility from a single center experience.

Alessandro Testolin, Stefano Ciccarelli, Giulia Vidano, Rossella Avitabile, Francesca Dusi, Filippo Alongi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient coaching for deep inspiration breath hold decreases set-up duration and left anterior descending artery dose for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Dosimetric advantage of ipsilateral lung and cardiac sparing of left breast cancer prone position compared with supine free breathing in the COVID-19 era and personalized medicine.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro Testolin1Department of Radiation Oncology, Policilinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-0179
Stefano Ciccarelli1Department of Radiation Oncology, Policilinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy.
Giulia Vidano1Department of Radiation Oncology, Policilinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy.
Rossella Avitabile1Department of Radiation Oncology, Policilinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy.
Francesca Dusi1Department of Radiation Oncology, Policilinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Padua, Italy.
Filippo Alongi2Department of Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital. Negrar, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate dose to organs at risk, target coverage and treatment compliance in left-sided breast cancer patients (LSBCP) treated with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique in a contest of daily clinical practice.

methodsA total of 280 consecutive LSBCP referred for adjuvant radiotherapy were systematically screened for suitability of DIBH technique. 239 were able to comply with the requirement for DIBH. Whole breast or chest wall were irradiated in DIBH, monitored by Varian RPM

resultsThe average mean heart dose (MHD) for all patients was 0.94 Gy and mean maximum LAD dose was 13.82 Gy. MHD and LAD maximum dose were significantly higher in patients treated with conventional fractionation whether expressed in absolute dose (1.44

conclusionDIBH and IMRT in daily clinical practice are feasible in high percentage of unselected patients and allows low levels of irradiation of organs at risk without compromising target coverage. However, despite low MHD a significant proportion of patients receives a maximum LAD dose superior to 20 Gy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The value of MHD used exclusively is not able to describe entirely the risk of late heart toxicity, which can be better evaluated with the joint analysis of the maximum dose to LAD region. The vast majority of LSBCP referred to adjuvant radiotherapy in the setting of routine practice are able to comply with the requirement of DIBH.

Indexed as

Breath HoldingAdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31265316
PMCPMC6732919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.