Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31265216›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2019

Brain activity associated with Dual-task performance of Ankle motor control during cognitive challenge.

Sue Peters, Janice J Eng, Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Michael R Borich, Elizabeth Dao, Ameen Amanian, Lara A Boyd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuroergonomic Assessment of Wheelchair Control Using Mobile fNIRS.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sue PetersFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Janice J EngFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Teresa Liu-AmbroseFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael R BorichSchool of Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Elizabeth DaoGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ameen AmanianFaculty of Applied Science, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lara A BoydFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-4549
University of British Columbia · CAEmory University · US

Funding

CIHR CGA-91753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSkilled Ankle motor control is frequently required while performing secondary cognitively demanding tasks such as socializing and avoiding obstacles while walking, termed "Dual tasking." It is likely that Dual-task performance increases demand on the brain, as both motor and cognitive systems require neural resources. The purpose of this study was to use functional MRI to understand which brain regions are involved in resolving Dual-task interference created by requiring high levels of Ankle motor control during a cognitive task.

methodsUsing functional MRI, brain activity was measured in sixteen young adults during performance of visually cued Ankle plantar flexion to a target (Ankle task), a cognitive task (Flanker task), and both tasks simultaneously (Dual task).

resultsDual-task performance did not impact the Ankle task (p = 0.78), but did affect behavior on the Flanker task. Response times for both the congruent and incongruent conditions during the Flanker task were significantly longer (p < 0.001, p = 0.050, respectively), and accuracy for the congruent condition decreased during Dual tasking (p < 0.001). Activity in 3 brain regions was associated with Dual-task Flanker performance. Percent signal change from baseline in Brodmann area (BA) 5, BA6, and the left caudate correlated with performance on the Flanker task during the Dual-task condition (R

conclusionsPerformance of Ankle motor control may be prioritized over a cognitive task during Dual-task performance. Our work advances Dual-task research by elucidating patterns of whole brain activity for Dual tasks that require Ankle motor control during a cognitive task.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionComprehensionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychomotor PerformancePsychophysiologyReaction TimeTask Performance and AnalysisWalkingYoung Adultattentionbraincognitioncognitive-motor Dual taskingFlankerfMRIsomatosensory

Identifiers

PMID31265216
PMCPMC6710191
OpenAlexW2953525625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.