Trial reportJAMA2019
Effect of Tanezumab on Joint Pain, Physical Function, and Patient Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis Among Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02697773 (A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A DOSE TITRATION REGIMEN FOR THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP OR KNEE), which is not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the analgesic efficacy and safety of a dose titration regimen for the subcutaneous administration of tanezumab in subjects with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee
Who cites it
98 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Contributing to Variability in Longitudinal Pain Scores in Osteoarthritis Randomised Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparison of tanezumab and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in efficacy and safety for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Multimethod quantitative benefit-risk assessment of treatments for moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Relative Efficacy and Safety of Tanezumab for Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.The Clinical journal of pain · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of tanezumab administered as a fixed dosing regimen in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled phase III trials.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Single Subcutaneous Administration of a Novel Anti-NGF Monoclonal Antibody (AK115) in Healthy Participants: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Phase I Clinical Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Anti-Nerve Growth Factor Antibody Tanezumab in Subjects With Cancer Pain Due to Bone Metastasis.The oncologist · 2023Trial
- The Relationship of Pain Reduction With Prevention of Knee Replacement Under Dynamic Intervention Strategies.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Trial
- Observed efficacy and clinically important improvements in participants with osteoarthritis treated with subcutaneous tanezumab: results from a 56-week randomized NSAID-controlled study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Trial
- Impact of tanezumab on health status, non-work activities and work productivity in adults with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Trial
- Gender, age, disease severity, body mass index and diabetes may not affect response to subcutaneous tanezumab in patients with osteoarthritis after 16 weeks of treatment. A subgroup analysis of placebo-controlled trials.International journal of clinical practice · 2021Trial
- Subcutaneous tanezumab for osteoarthritis: Is the early improvement in pain and function meaningful and sustained?European journal of pain (London, England) · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Subcutaneous tanezumab for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: efficacy and safety results from a 24-week randomised phase III study with a 24-week follow-up period.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies as Advanced Therapies for Companion Animals: Species Adaptation, Fc Biology, Clinical Translation, and Future Platforms.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.MedComm · 2026Review
- Insights into the complex relationship between pain and imaging-detected structural damage in knee osteoarthritis.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Inflammatory, angiogenic and neurogenic serum biomarkers in patients with patellofemoral pain compared to healthy controls.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) may remain symptomatic with traditional OA treatments. Objective: To assess 2 subcutaneous tanezumab dosing regimens for OA. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial from January 2016 to May 14, 2018 (last patient visit). Patients enrolled were 18 years or older with hip or knee OA, inadequate response to OA analgesics, and no radiographic evidence of prespecified joint safety conditions. Interventions: Patients received by subcutaneous administration either tanezumab, 2.5 mg, at day 1 and week 8 (n = 231); tanezumab, 2.5 mg at day 1 and 5 mg at week 8 (ie, tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg; n = 233); or placebo at day 1 and week 8 (n = 232). Main Outcomes and Measures: Co-primary end points were change from baseline to week 16 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain (0-10, no to extreme pain), WOMAC Physical Function (0-10, no to extreme difficulty), and patient global assessment of osteoarthritis (PGA-OA) (1-5, very good to very poor) scores. Results: Among 698 patients randomized, 696 received 1 or more treatment doses (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [9.6] years; 65.1% women), and 582 (83.6%) completed the trial. From baseline to 16 weeks, mean WOMAC Pain scores decreased from 7.1 to 3.6 in the tanezumab, 2.5 mg, group; 7.3 to 3.6 in the tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg, group; and 7.3 to 4.4 in the placebo group (least squares mean differences [95% CI] vs placebo were -0.60 [-1.07 to -0.13; P = .01] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.73 [-1.20 to -0.26; P = .002] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Mean WOMAC Physical Function scores decreased from 7.2 to 3.7 in the 2.5-mg group, 7.4 to 3.6 in the 2.5/5-mg group, and 7.4 to 4.5 with placebo (differences vs placebo, -0.66 [-1.14 to -0.19; P = .007] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.89 [-1.37 to -0.42; P < .001] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Mean PGA-OA scores decreased from 3.4 to 2.4 in the 2.5-mg group, 3.5 to 2.4 in the 2.5/5-mg group, and 3.5 to 2.7 with placebo (differences vs placebo, -0.22 [-0.39 to -0.05; P = .01] for tanezumab, 2.5 mg, and -0.25 [-0.41 to -0.08; P = .004] for tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg). Rapidly progressive OA occurred only in tanezumab-treated patients (2.5 mg: n = 5, 2.2%; 2.5/5 mg: n = 1, 0.4%). The incidence of total joint replacements was 8 (3.5%), 16 (6.9%), and 4 (1.7%) in the tanezumab, 2.5 mg; tanezumab, 2.5/5 mg; and placebo groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate to severe OA of the knee or hip and inadequate response to standard analgesics, tanezumab, compared with placebo, resulted in statistically significant improvements in scores assessing pain and physical function, and in PGA-OA, although the improvements were modest and tanezumab-treated patients had more joint safety events and total joint replacements. Further research is needed to determine the clinical importance of these efficacy and adverse event findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697773.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.