ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2019
Interhospital transfer on intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke in three chinese municipal stroke centers.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delays in receiving Alteplase and related factors in patients with stroke referred to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan-Iran in 2020-2021.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Workflow Intervals and Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On-Vs. Off-hours in China: The ANGEL-ACT Registry.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Effect of butylphthalide on new cerebral microbleeds in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Medicine · 2020Article
- Improving Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Implementation and Evaluation of a Theory-Based Resource Integration Project in China.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We included acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) at three stroke centers via either interhospital transfer or direct presentation and compared the clinical outcomes and time metrics to analyze the impact of interhospital transfer on intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We retrospectively enrolled patients with AIS admitted to three stroke centers from October 1, 2016, to June 1, 2018. Patients treated with rt-PA were classified into the transfer and direct groups. We collected the patients' general information and time points. Statistical analyses were conducted to examine differences in the clinical outcomes and time metrics between the two groups. A total of 326 patients were enrolled, including 84 patients in the transfer group and 242 in the direct group. The transfer group had a longer onset-to-door time (OTD) (124.5 ± 50.6 min versus 83.2 ± 47.2 min, P < 0.01) but a shorter door-to-needle time (DNT) (53.0 ± 26.3 min versus 81.5 ± 31.1 min, P < 0.01), and the stroke onset-to-needle time was 177.4 ± 51.0 min versus 164.7 ± 53.3 min (P = 0.057). Compared with the direct group, the transfer group achieved similar modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-2 outcomes (59.5% versus 58.7%, P = 0.768). Interhospital transfer was not an independent risk factor associated with a poor outcome at 90 days. In three Chinese municipal stroke centers, patients with an AIS referral have a longer OTD but a shorter DNT. DNTs of municipal hospitals were far longer than the current international standard, and their improvement is an important task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31264060What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.