Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31264017›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

Deep learning to differentiate parkinsonian disorders separately using single midsagittal MR imaging: a proof of concept study.

Shigeru Kiryu, Koichiro Yasaka, Hiroyuki Akai, Yasuhiro Nakata, Yusuke Sugomori, Seigo Hara, Maria Seo, Osamu Abe, Kuni Ohtomo

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of parkinson's disease with neuroimaging modalities using machine learning and artificial intelligence: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shigeru KiryuDepartment of Radiology, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, 537-3, Iguchi, Nasushiobara, Tochigi, 329-2763, Japan. kiryu-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1440-9483
Koichiro YasakaDepartment of Radiology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan.
Hiroyuki AkaiDepartment of Radiology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan.
Yasuhiro NakataDepartment of Neuroradiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital, 2-6-1 Musashidai, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-0042, Japan.
Yusuke SugomoriMICIN, Inc., Nihon Building 13F, 2-6-2 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0004, Japan.
Seigo HaraMICIN, Inc., Nihon Building 13F, 2-6-2 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0004, Japan.
Maria SeoMICIN, Inc., Nihon Building 13F, 2-6-2 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0004, Japan.
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Kuni OhtomoInternational University of Health and Welfare, 2600-1 kitakanamaru, Otawara, Tochigi, 324-8501, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPTokyo Metropolitan Neurological Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning with the convolutional neural networks (CNN) to distinguish each representative parkinsonian disorder using MRI.

methodsThis clinical retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for written informed consent was waived. Midsagittal T1-weighted MRI of a total of 419 subjects (125 Parkinson's disease (PD), 98 progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 54 multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features (MSA-P) patients, and 142 normal subjects) between January 2012 and April 2016 was retrospectively assessed. To deal with the overfitting problem of deep learning, all subjects were randomly divided into training (85%) and validation (15%) data sets with the same proportions of each disease and normal subjects. We trained the CNN to distinguish each parkinsonian disorder using single midsagittal T1-weighted MRI with a training group to minimize the differences between predicted output probabilities and the clinical diagnoses; then, we adopted the trained CNN to the validation data set. Subjects were classified into each parkinsonian disorder or normal condition according to the final diagnosis of the trained CNN, and we assessed the diagnostic performance of the CNN.

resultsThe accuracies of diagnostic performances regarding PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal subjects were 96.8, 93.7, 95.2, and 98.4%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for distinguishing each condition from others (PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal subjects) were 0.995, 0.982, 0.990, and 1.000, respectively.

conclusionDeep learning with CNN enables highly accurate discrimination of parkinsonian disorders using MRI. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning convolution neural network achieves differential diagnosis of PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal controls with an accuracy of 96.8, 93.7, 95.2, and 98.4%, respectively. • The areas under the curves for distinguishing between PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normality were 0.995, 0.982, 0.990, and 1.000, respectively. • CNN may learn important features that humans not notice, and has a possibility to perform previously impossible diagnoses.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple System AtrophyNeural Networks, ComputerParkinson DiseaseParkinsonian DisordersProof of Concept StudyRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingParkinson diseaseROC curve

Identifiers

PMID31264017
OpenAlexW2954001886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.