ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Deep learning to differentiate parkinsonian disorders separately using single midsagittal MR imaging: a proof of concept study.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of parkinson's disease with neuroimaging modalities using machine learning and artificial intelligence: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Predictive modelling of brain disorders with magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review of modelling practices, transparency, and interpretability in the use of convolutional neural networks.Human brain mapping · 2023Pooled it
- Machine Learning for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease: A Review of Literature.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- Deep learning-based cognitive impairment brain imaging analysis: New methods, new technologies, and new paradigms.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Precise disease heterogeneity and progression quantification in MSA and Parkinson's disease using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Novel applications of machine learning and computational neuroscience models to neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease and related disorders.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Privacy-by-Design with Federated Learning will drive future Rare Disease Research.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Classification of Interventional Radiology Reports into Technique Categories with a Fine-Tuned Large Language Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Brain structural features with functional priori to classify Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy using diagnostic MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- COVID-19 Hierarchical Classification Using a Deep Learning Multi-Modal.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A methodical exploration of imaging modalities from dataset to detection through machine learning paradigms in prominent lung disease diagnosis: a review.BMC medical imaging · 2024Review
- Commercially Available Deep-learning-reconstruction of MR Imaging of the Knee at 1.5T Has Higher Image Quality Than Conventionally-reconstructed Imaging at 3T: A Normal Volunteer Study.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in the Odyssey of Rare Diseases.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Acceleration of knee magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of compressed sensing and commercially available deep learning reconstruction: a preliminary study.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- A Computerized Analysis with Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease: Past Studies and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Current Applications of Machine Learning in Spine: From Clinical View.Global spine journal · 2022Review
- Impact of deep learning reconstruction on intracranial 1.5 T magnetic resonance angiography.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Mining imaging and clinical data with machine learning approaches for the diagnosis and early detection of Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2022Review
- Deep learning for screening primary osteopenia and osteoporosis using spine radiographs and patient clinical covariates in a Chinese population.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Parkinson's disease: deep learning with a parameter-weighted structural connectome matrix for diagnosis and neural circuit disorder investigation.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning with the convolutional neural networks (CNN) to distinguish each representative parkinsonian disorder using MRI.
methodsThis clinical retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement for written informed consent was waived. Midsagittal T1-weighted MRI of a total of 419 subjects (125 Parkinson's disease (PD), 98 progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and 54 multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features (MSA-P) patients, and 142 normal subjects) between January 2012 and April 2016 was retrospectively assessed. To deal with the overfitting problem of deep learning, all subjects were randomly divided into training (85%) and validation (15%) data sets with the same proportions of each disease and normal subjects. We trained the CNN to distinguish each parkinsonian disorder using single midsagittal T1-weighted MRI with a training group to minimize the differences between predicted output probabilities and the clinical diagnoses; then, we adopted the trained CNN to the validation data set. Subjects were classified into each parkinsonian disorder or normal condition according to the final diagnosis of the trained CNN, and we assessed the diagnostic performance of the CNN.
resultsThe accuracies of diagnostic performances regarding PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal subjects were 96.8, 93.7, 95.2, and 98.4%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for distinguishing each condition from others (PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal subjects) were 0.995, 0.982, 0.990, and 1.000, respectively.
conclusionDeep learning with CNN enables highly accurate discrimination of parkinsonian disorders using MRI. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning convolution neural network achieves differential diagnosis of PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normal controls with an accuracy of 96.8, 93.7, 95.2, and 98.4%, respectively. • The areas under the curves for distinguishing between PD, PSP, MSA-P, and normality were 0.995, 0.982, 0.990, and 1.000, respectively. • CNN may learn important features that humans not notice, and has a possibility to perform previously impossible diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.