Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31263996›Full record

Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020

The influence of atrial fibrillation on the levels of NT-proBNP versus GDF-15 in patients with heart failure.

Bernadet T Santema, Michelle M Y Chan, Jasper Tromp, Martin Dokter, Haye H van der Wal, Johanna E Emmens, Janny Takens, Nilesh J Samani, Leong L Ng, Chim C Lang and 14 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. BMP10 reflects pre-capillary pulmonary hemodynamics: association of biomarkers and hemodynamic parameters in pulmonary hypertension.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Animal and cellular models of atrial fibrillation: a review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of bone morphogenetic protein 10 in acute dyspnea: a cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Bernadet T SantemaDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michelle M Y ChanDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Jasper TrompDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Martin DokterDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Haye H van der WalDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johanna E EmmensDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Janny TakensDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nilesh J SamaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
Leong L NgDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
Chim C LangDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Peter van der MeerDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jozine M Ter MaatenDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kevin DammanDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kenneth DicksteinUniversity of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
John G ClelandNational Heart & Lung Institute, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Imperial College, Sydney St, Chelsea, London, SW3 6NP, UK.
Faiez ZannadInserm CIC 1433, Université de Lorrain, CHU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK), and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Marco MetraDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Institute of Cardiology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rudolf A de BoerDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dirk J van VeldhuisenDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michiel RienstraDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Carolyn S P LamDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Adriaan A VoorsDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.a.voors@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5417-4415
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Leicester · GBGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHarefield Hospital · GBInserm · FRStavanger University Hospital · NOUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté · FRUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council FP7-242209-BIOSTAT-CHF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn heart failure (HF), levels of NT-proBNP are influenced by the presence of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF), making it difficult to distinguish between HF versus AF in patients with raised NT-proBNP. It is unknown whether levels of GDF-15 are also influenced by AF in patients with HF. In this study we compared the plasma levels of NT-proBNP versus GDF-15 in patients with HF in AF versus sinus rhythm (SR).

methodsIn a post hoc analysis of the index cohort of BIOSTAT-CHF (n = 2516), we studied patients with HF categorized into three groups: (1) AF at baseline (n = 733), (2) SR at baseline with a history of AF (n = 183), and (3) SR at baseline and no history of AF (n = 1025). The findings were validated in the validation cohort of BIOSTAT-CHF (n = 1738).

resultsPlasma NT-proBNP levels of patients who had AF at baseline were higher than those of patients in SR (both with and without a history of AF), even after multivariable adjustment (3417 [25th-75th percentile 1897-6486] versus 1788 [682-3870], adjusted p < 0.001, versus 2231 pg/mL [902-5270], adjusted p < 0.001). In contrast, after adjusting for clinical confounders, the levels of GDF-15 were comparable between the three groups (3179 [2062-5253] versus 2545 [1686-4337], adjusted p = 0.36, versus 2294 [1471-3855] pg/mL, adjusted p = 0.08). Similar patterns of both NT-proBNP and GDF-15 were found in the validation cohort.

conclusionThese data show that in patients with HF, NT-proBNP is significantly influenced by underlying AF at time of measurement and not by previous episodes of AF, whereas the levels of GDF-15 are not influenced by the presence of AF. Therefore, GDF-15 might have additive value combined with NT-proBNP in the assessment of patients with HF and concomitant AF.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAtrial FibrillationBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleGrowth Differentiation Factor 15Heart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsProspective StudiesBiomarkersGDF15 protein, humanGrowth Differentiation Factor 15Natriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Atrial fibrillationBiomarkersGDF-15Heart failureNatriuretic peptides

Identifiers

PMID31263996
PMCPMC7042190
OpenAlexW2953741209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.