Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31263977›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2019

Challenges of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients and How to Optimize Success.

Gulden Menderes, Stefan M Gysler, Nalini Vadivelu, Dan-Arin Silasi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Considerations and Outcomes of Robotic Urologic Surgery in Obese Patients.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gulden MenderesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT, 06520-806, USA. gulden.menderes@yale.edu.
Stefan M GyslerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT, 06520-806, USA.
Nalini VadiveluDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 20805, New Haven, CT, 06520-8051, USA.
Dan-Arin SilasiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208063, New Haven, CT, 06520-806, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRobotic surgery has been shown to have a significant benefit in obese gynecologic patients over open surgery. However, robotic surgery in these patients requires a thorough understanding of the physiologic adaptations caused by obesity, adequate preoperative optimization, specialized equipment and techniques, and careful attention to intra- and postoperative management in order to minimize complications. This article reviews the benefits of a minimally invasive approach in obese patients and provides a thorough guide to perioperative management of obese patients undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery. A useful set of tips and tricks to overcome many of the technical challenges in performing robotic surgery in the obese patients is included. RECENT

findingsIn the USA, obesity has risen to affect 39.8% of the population, which leads to increased incidence of mortality, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Moreover, obese patients are at greater risk of perioperative complications during gynecologic surgery. With the use of laparoscopy, many of the perioperative risks of surgery in obese patients can be ameliorated. However, minimally invasive surgery in obese patients is technically challenging. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy addresses several of these challenges, allowing surgeons to offer minimally invasive approaches to patients with extreme BMIs while reducing perioperative risk. Obese patients undergoing gynecologic surgery receive a greater benefit than their non-obese counterparts from a laparoscopic approach, and current data support the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in the obese population. Therefore, every effort to offer a minimally invasive surgery to obese patients should be made.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansIncidenceMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsAnesthesiaGynecologyLaparoscopic hysterectomyMinimally invasive surgeryObesityRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID31263977
OpenAlexW2955064502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.