ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2019
Challenges of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients and How to Optimize Success.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure with and without recruitment maneuvers in obese patients during bariatric surgery.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2022Trial
- Impact of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Total Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: Balancing Clinical Benefit, Cost-Effectiveness, and Accessibility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic vs. robotic sacrocolpopexy: influence of age, BMI, and parity on perioperative outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- An eight-year analysis of robotic surgery in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer in a tertiary center in Singapore.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024Article
- Clinical Considerations and Outcomes of Robotic Urologic Surgery in Obese Patients.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2024Article
- Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Long-Term Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Reoperation Risk in Obese Women: Vaginal and Laparoscopic Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Perioperative Management of Robotic-Assisted Gynecological Surgery in a Super Morbidly Obese Patient.Cureus · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of synchronous panniculectomy and endometrial cancer surgery in obese patients: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of postoperative complicationsJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2020Article
- Robotics-assisted surgery in gynecology: A single-center experience with the Hugo™ RAS system in India.Women's health (London, England)Article
- Management of Obesity in Menopausal Women: Implications for Metabolic Health and Minimally Invasive Surgery.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRobotic surgery has been shown to have a significant benefit in obese gynecologic patients over open surgery. However, robotic surgery in these patients requires a thorough understanding of the physiologic adaptations caused by obesity, adequate preoperative optimization, specialized equipment and techniques, and careful attention to intra- and postoperative management in order to minimize complications. This article reviews the benefits of a minimally invasive approach in obese patients and provides a thorough guide to perioperative management of obese patients undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery. A useful set of tips and tricks to overcome many of the technical challenges in performing robotic surgery in the obese patients is included. RECENT
findingsIn the USA, obesity has risen to affect 39.8% of the population, which leads to increased incidence of mortality, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and stroke. Moreover, obese patients are at greater risk of perioperative complications during gynecologic surgery. With the use of laparoscopy, many of the perioperative risks of surgery in obese patients can be ameliorated. However, minimally invasive surgery in obese patients is technically challenging. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy addresses several of these challenges, allowing surgeons to offer minimally invasive approaches to patients with extreme BMIs while reducing perioperative risk. Obese patients undergoing gynecologic surgery receive a greater benefit than their non-obese counterparts from a laparoscopic approach, and current data support the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in the obese population. Therefore, every effort to offer a minimally invasive surgery to obese patients should be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.