Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31263972›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2019

Use of Telepsychiatry in Emergency and Crisis Intervention: Current Evidence.

Isabelle Reinhardt, Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, Jürgen Zielasek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring Trauma and Resilience among NYS COVID-19 Pandemic Survivors.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabelle ReinhardtLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany. Isabelle.Reinhardt@lvr.de.
Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-MayfrankLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
Jürgen ZielasekLVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany.
LVR-Klinik Köln · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of this review is to evaluate recent literature on the use of telepsychiatry in mental crises or emergency situations. RECENT

findingsResults from recent studies which evaluated the implementation of a telepsychiatric consultation model in emergency departments point at a reduction of length of stay and a drop in admissions, increased cost-effectiveness, and improved satisfaction of patients and staff. There was almost no empirical evidence on videoconferencing in crisis intervention within the context of crisis resolution teams or online therapies. No study reporting on telepsychiatry videoconferencing in the context of disasters was found. There is still very little but increasing empirical evidence supporting the implementation of telepsychiatry in emergencies. Other mental crisis-related implementation settings remain to be researched. The implications and future research potential are discussed.

Indexed as

Crisis InterventionEmergenciesPsychiatryTelemedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMental DisordersVideoconferencingEmergency telepsychiatryOnline crisis interventionTele-mental healthVideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID31263972
OpenAlexW2955500231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.