ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019
Cultivable bacterial diversity, physicochemical profiles, and toxicity determination of car wash effluents.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficient technologies for carwash wastewater treatment: a systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Pooled it
- Sustainable pretreatment and adsorption of chemical oxygen demand from car wash wastewater using Noug sawdust activated carbon.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated biological and UV-Fenton processes for the treatment of automobile service station wastewater.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025Article
- Cleaning of Ultrafiltration Membranes: Long-Term Treatment of Car Wash Wastewater as a Case Study.Membranes · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carwash effluents contain potentially toxic chemical and microbiological pollutants which may pose public health and ecotoxicological threats if directly discharged into surface waters. This work was aimed at determining the microbiological, physicochemical, and toxicological parameters of carwash effluents. Toxicity assays were determined using whole effluent toxicity (WET) using Danio rerio and Daphnia pulex. For microbiological analysis, sample aliquots were spread plated onto R2A Agar for the isolation of heterotrophic bacteria followed by DNA extraction from axenic cultures for sequencing analysis. The pH of effluent samples lay in the alkaline range, and ranged from pH 7 to pH 10. Sample salinity ranged from 0.2 to 0.3 g/Kg. Electrical conductivity values ranged from 274 to 554 μS/cm. Concentrations of Co, Pb, and Ni were < 1 mg/L in all samples while the concentrations of Cu ranged from 0.94 to 3.8 mg/L and Zn from 1.15 to 3 mg/L. Oil and grease concentrations ranged from 5 to 24 mg/L. The concentrations of TPH-GRO were low at < 1 mg/L in all samples. All the carwash effluents were categorised as acutely toxic, with ≥ 75% mortality recorded for both test organisms within the first 24 h of exposure to the test solutions. Heterotrophic bacteria counts ranged from 2800 to 4600 CFU/100 ml. Sequencing analysis revealed that 57% of the isolates were closely related to Aeromonas species, with 43% closely related to Pseudomonas species. We conclude that carwash effluents are veritable sources of microbiological contaminants and potentially toxic chemical pollutants of public health and ecotoxicological concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.